per court order no worries that is given ^^

If they are seeing stuff that suggests possible fraud shouldnt we be able to look deeper

Does it hurt to look

We have spent a lot of time trying to reproduce several "data anomalies" in this channel heh

That's the issue

No one wants to look

(none came to fruition and some were debunked)

That should be the way they decide who is president if no one gets 270...

by the time alotted in a year they'll get 270 even if they squint

Clinton supporters were saying the same thing 4 years ago...

I think it was Jill and her campaign got them to stop looking

> No one wants to look
@RickyDigits They had to have looked, otherwise what they submitted to the court about complete untraceability was laughably, egregiously speculative.

If republicans lose, I hope they at least learn their lesson. Ban any electronic or machine form of voting and require ID and proof of address for voting.

@TaLoN132 gotta research that about 2016. Clinton supporters

Jill was pushing a recount and the dnc convinced her to drop it

I still think that's because of the way that NEP and AP collect the data, aggregate it, and upload it to the various news organizations.

Did you see my graph?

There is a reason most first world nation outright BAN voting machines.

My graph might have insight into how the data is collected heh

@TaLoN132 We have already established that how media outlets gather and report has direct bearing on counting processes. This is a given.

This is a state issue

But what about that ballot dump when to many were dumped than what the machines could even process in that time frame?

There were 3 major major dumps of data clearly visible

The point is that the loser of every election in history could have been doing this exact thing. Trump is not a politician and hasn't experienced the sting of losing an election yet. Most politicians learn over the course of their career that accepting defeat is not the same thing as being a loser.

Mmm I might try to enhance that graph tonight

> If republicans lose, I hope they at least learn their lesson. Ban any electronic or machine form of voting and require ID and proof of address for voting.
@leftingfighter33 Plenty of republicans won. If Republicans = Trump, you're doing it wrong.

People really must hate trump to see Biden as a win though

We do. We really, really do.

😂😂😂

Lol

team red symbol do

Fair enough

I thought the counting process was how the votes were tabulated to feed the media outlets via their data aggregators... How can the way the resultant information is reported have an effect on how it is counted?

> team red symbol do
@𝕴𝖓𝖞𝖇𝖎𝖘𝕴𝖓𝖘𝖚𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊 We will submit official permission forms later, for your consideration. For now, we're just talking.

Yes team trump . Dropped the ball to many times. Time for team blue

I have always thought that states should issue voter ID's when people register to vote. If the concern is that some people don't have gov't issue ID's then issue them one when they register to vote.

> I thought the counting process was how the votes were tabulated to feed the media outlets via their data aggregators... How can the way the resultant information is reported have an effect on how it is counted?
@TaLoN132 Yeah I guess that connection wasn't thought through very well. The argument was SO convincing though.

I was almost there...

Lol

In canada elections are regulated federally as they should and ID together with proof of addres is required to vote.

You see the shitshow that state level regulation results in.

Can the homeless vote in Canada