Message from @Killroy
Discord ID: 781635184843292722
But I thought it was venezuelan /s
Lmao
There is a reason most first world nations ban voting machines in feferal elections
What you think and what you hate amount to(0)
Yeah but states are casting the votes. They just need to figure out what their people want, in whatever way they see fit. States aren't infants.
Americans want to see by Nov.3 who is the president. Dont wanna wait 1 month to count all those votes
Because they use paper ballots. It's not an indictment of Dominion just a curious fact.
There was venezuelan money in the company. I don't understand how the hell anyone csn be OK using voting mschines from a highly political company that received direct payments from politicians and political PACS.
80m now
*80,000,00
Thanks
Lol
Are the machines made in Canada or usa,??
China
Soros made them in Cuba
JK - I don't know
Hand built
Will be 95,000,000 overnight
I mean I agree. I don't like machines for voting myself. But after the election is not the best time to fix the problem.
Paper ballots are not foolproof either...
Meh. We can call this 'before the next election', like we could have done after 2016 with any shortfall claims.
Can you imagine being OK using voting machines and software from a company that got Donations from Trump? Ah, but because political PACS dont have high visibility and other politicians who also donated as not as high up its ok? What a fucking banana republic joke.
I think that we need to revisit the whole anonymous voter requirement. It was not originally an issue. It became an issue in vote buying schemes, but it opens the door to other fraud.
The lady on Michigan said . She didnt want to certify the election cuse she founded issues in the primary elections . Then the national came . She said the issues werent fixed. Wasn't her job in the first place to fix the issues??
I don't want to hear another word of fraud I've been here 9hours now
today
^^
Bad place to be for wanting to avoid that word.
Voting in person used to have a 1 to 3 percent failure rate
@Pantsdonkey, you just advanced to level 3!
You'd think they'd be paying attention during the hearing
Never was about fraud. Media drove that false story.
Yeah it should be pseudonymous
To enable my random sampling auditing scheme
Barcode on ballot, and a list of matching names to barcodes held by a competing government organization (the auditing org)
It can be done in away that it requires many witnesses to unmask a ballot to a name, and you can ensure that the auditors themselves don't even see the ballot, but they can present the voter with the ballot to verify it
Kinda Manhattan-projecty. Me like.






