Big tech is definitely censoring our voices.

We may suspend or terminate your account or cease providing you with all or part of the Services at any time for any or no reason, including, but not limited to, if we reasonably believe: (i) you have violated these Terms or the Twitter Rules and Policies or

But freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from liability. That is if you falsely accused someone of something and that ruins a reputation then they have the ability to sue you on a court of law and seek recompense for the damage you've caused them. Social media platforms have always asserted that they are just a platform for free speech and therefore not liable for the content that speech. But when they edit content then an argument goes away.

has anyone read through the twitter Terms of service

Its their business... their policies..its like a restaurant. .. that dont want costumers with baggy pants sneakers and hats... are they censoring this kind of costumers

Agree! Absolutely. I do feel senate is beginning to narrow this argument.

it basically says they can do whatever they want

@MatiLuc restaurants aren't typically subsidized by the government to the extent big tech companies have been.

They bail out all the time

@MatiLuc it's not on the same scale.

It saw someone mention it was like a Trojan horse. I do agree with that. But they shouldn’t be selectively bias. Waiting behind the trees to strike at the most important time of our country. Surely they’ll find a way to make them accountable.

The government give money to Google and FB. ?

@MatiLuc much of the technology used by the tech companies comes from government research.

That was true 30 to 40 years ago but not so much anymore

The network itself is from a DARPA project.

Im guessing the gov. Wants part of that company then. Wouldn't be that becoming a commi. Or socialist government

Originally the government are the people that laid out the groundwork for the internet as it existed up until around 10-15 years ago is the argument some people seem to be making right now.

Then private companies began to lay down updated technology into networks.

It has to link back to free speech somehow. Perhaps policies like that become prohibited?

They need to control their own news network

I don’t know the answer. This is what we pay our senators to do.

My point is if the president says ..my MAGA people go and attack Chinese people. That should not be spread

that is how we got into this mess in the first place

That is illegal already @MatiLuc

@Repeat I would argue that tech company control speech for the investment banks.

The president controls nuclear weapons...

@busillis In which case you reduce the population controlled to passive victims.

When he said Covid19 is a hoax . That is a dangerous message

@MatiLuc people should attack the Chinese Communist Chinese Party.

He’s the president

I think the transition goes back further than that. You're only thinking of the last mile as it's called or the connection to the residential units.

I dont think he is able to just push and said Nuke Russia.

I'm talking primarily linking fiber optics yes.

@Doc people have the amount of government they allow

@busillis and the amount of oligarchs they allow.

Covid has a better survivability rate than the common flue, the reason it is killing more people is because more people are getting it than the number of people who get the flue each year

@MatiLuc Correct.

@Repeat beign the president doesn't give the power to do that

@Doc yes exactly

@busillis, you just advanced to level 2!

One could say, every people at every time, constructs their reality completely as they like it, they just hate the fruits of the tree they love. @busillis