Message from @busillis

Discord ID: 781900455173029928


2020-11-27 14:59:22 UTC  

"How the CIA made Google. Inside the secret network behind mass… | by Nafeez Ahmed | INSURGE intelligence | Medium" https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

2020-11-27 15:00:55 UTC  

"In-Q-Tel – Strategic investor that accelerates the development and delivery of cutting-edge technologies to U.S. government agencies" https://www.iqt.org

2020-11-27 15:03:30 UTC  

"Technology Transfer | The MITRE Corporation" https://www.mitre.org/research/technology-transfer

2020-11-27 15:03:31 UTC  

@busillis, you just advanced to level 1!

2020-11-27 15:04:11 UTC  

I don’t want to limit big tech company’s freedom of speech, but I also don’t want the president to be censored. The compromise is having a presidential alert system where he updates it once a week.

2020-11-27 15:05:01 UTC  

He would like to censor the media when they publish his audio recordings.. grab them by the p*** , all the scientists are morons, fauci should be fire, telling his friends this is deadly stuff , etc etc..

2020-11-27 15:05:34 UTC  

How about no one is censored, big tech, you, me, POTUS etc. Like let’s write it into the constitution or something that says we have freedom of speech🤣

2020-11-27 15:06:36 UTC  

Big tech is definitely censoring our voices.

2020-11-27 15:07:51 UTC  

We may suspend or terminate your account or cease providing you with all or part of the Services at any time for any or no reason, including, but not limited to, if we reasonably believe: (i) you have violated these Terms or the Twitter Rules and Policies or

2020-11-27 15:08:27 UTC  

But freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from liability. That is if you falsely accused someone of something and that ruins a reputation then they have the ability to sue you on a court of law and seek recompense for the damage you've caused them. Social media platforms have always asserted that they are just a platform for free speech and therefore not liable for the content that speech. But when they edit content then an argument goes away.

2020-11-27 15:08:36 UTC  

has anyone read through the twitter Terms of service

2020-11-27 15:08:54 UTC  

Its their business... their policies..its like a restaurant. .. that dont want costumers with baggy pants sneakers and hats... are they censoring this kind of costumers

2020-11-27 15:09:25 UTC  

Agree! Absolutely. I do feel senate is beginning to narrow this argument.

2020-11-27 15:09:45 UTC  

it basically says they can do whatever they want

2020-11-27 15:10:56 UTC  

@MatiLuc restaurants aren't typically subsidized by the government to the extent big tech companies have been.

2020-11-27 15:11:35 UTC  

They bail out all the time

2020-11-27 15:12:00 UTC  

@MatiLuc it's not on the same scale.

2020-11-27 15:12:09 UTC  

It saw someone mention it was like a Trojan horse. I do agree with that. But they shouldn’t be selectively bias. Waiting behind the trees to strike at the most important time of our country. Surely they’ll find a way to make them accountable.

2020-11-27 15:12:15 UTC  

The government give money to Google and FB. ?

2020-11-27 15:13:15 UTC  

@MatiLuc much of the technology used by the tech companies comes from government research.

2020-11-27 15:13:58 UTC  

That was true 30 to 40 years ago but not so much anymore

2020-11-27 15:14:08 UTC  

The network itself is from a DARPA project.

2020-11-27 15:14:39 UTC  

Im guessing the gov. Wants part of that company then. Wouldn't be that becoming a commi. Or socialist government

2020-11-27 15:15:55 UTC  

Originally the government are the people that laid out the groundwork for the internet as it existed up until around 10-15 years ago is the argument some people seem to be making right now.

2020-11-27 15:16:19 UTC  

Then private companies began to lay down updated technology into networks.

2020-11-27 15:16:50 UTC  

It has to link back to free speech somehow. Perhaps policies like that become prohibited?

2020-11-27 15:17:03 UTC  

They need to control their own news network

2020-11-27 15:18:10 UTC  

I don’t know the answer. This is what we pay our senators to do.

2020-11-27 15:18:48 UTC  

My point is if the president says ..my MAGA people go and attack Chinese people. That should not be spread

2020-11-27 15:19:03 UTC  

that is how we got into this mess in the first place

2020-11-27 15:19:10 UTC  

That is illegal already @MatiLuc

2020-11-27 15:19:36 UTC  

@Repeat I would argue that tech company control speech for the investment banks.

2020-11-27 15:20:04 UTC  

The president controls nuclear weapons...

2020-11-27 15:20:19 UTC  

@busillis In which case you reduce the population controlled to passive victims.

2020-11-27 15:20:38 UTC  

When he said Covid19 is a hoax . That is a dangerous message

2020-11-27 15:20:55 UTC  

@MatiLuc people should attack the Chinese Communist Chinese Party.

2020-11-27 15:21:04 UTC  

He’s the president

2020-11-27 15:21:11 UTC  

I think the transition goes back further than that. You're only thinking of the last mile as it's called or the connection to the residential units.

2020-11-27 15:21:30 UTC  

I dont think he is able to just push and said Nuke Russia.

2020-11-27 15:21:35 UTC  

I'm talking primarily linking fiber optics yes.