Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 781902582700179476
That was true 30 to 40 years ago but not so much anymore
The network itself is from a DARPA project.
Im guessing the gov. Wants part of that company then. Wouldn't be that becoming a commi. Or socialist government
Originally the government are the people that laid out the groundwork for the internet as it existed up until around 10-15 years ago is the argument some people seem to be making right now.
Then private companies began to lay down updated technology into networks.
It has to link back to free speech somehow. Perhaps policies like that become prohibited?
They need to control their own news network
I don’t know the answer. This is what we pay our senators to do.
My point is if the president says ..my MAGA people go and attack Chinese people. That should not be spread
that is how we got into this mess in the first place
@Repeat I would argue that tech company control speech for the investment banks.
The president controls nuclear weapons...
@busillis In which case you reduce the population controlled to passive victims.
When he said Covid19 is a hoax . That is a dangerous message
He’s the president
I think the transition goes back further than that. You're only thinking of the last mile as it's called or the connection to the residential units.
I dont think he is able to just push and said Nuke Russia.
I'm talking primarily linking fiber optics yes.
Covid has a better survivability rate than the common flue, the reason it is killing more people is because more people are getting it than the number of people who get the flue each year
@busillis, you just advanced to level 2!
One could say, every people at every time, constructs their reality completely as they like it, they just hate the fruits of the tree they love. @busillis
I believe you have to be in a time of war with a power to actually be able to control the nuclear arsenal. I could be wrong of course.\
But it's not just "The president can nuke whoever he wants willy-nilly."
It's the same thing with declaring war.
His gerneral will not allow him to just do whatever he wants. . Like that statement he made. Thar he doesn't follow no individual person.. just the constitution i think he said
IIRC The senate is the entity that controls declarations of war.
I don’t claim to be the expert on the powers of the president or how they must be executed through whatever protocols but we elect a president to do their job. Censoring a president is not wise and should be illegal IMO because it opens the door for a coup
The biggest players in war are the the people who deal in arms.
Which is why many governments do that now.
Not to mention the divisions between the governed take the focus off of the rulers.
Can the President say invade Cuba. And the Senate says no . Then who wins this argument