Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 781897350493765702
I'm an agreement that this should be looked at. If social media platforms are going to edit content then they should be subject to liability for that content.
The straw that broke the camel's back was that I was getting alerts for stuff that was happening a thousand miles away.
Lets say you own your own website and people were posting stuff you disagreed with should you be required to leave it on your websight?
@Jorgen Johnson, you just advanced to level 11!
Im just thinking a once a month update maybe a page long and you can turn it off if you want.
No and there's nothing that requires you to leave that content on. But the big social media platforms claim not to edit content and therefore not be subject to liability for said content. Yet they do seem to edit content now and thus should be held liable.
The whole purpose of an amber alert was to give you immediate notice that something local had happened. Say some kid had just been kidnapped or gone missing in your neighborhood. But when they're sending me alerts for stuff that's happening a thousand miles away that's not helpful.
We could call it a presidential alert
I am not understanding the relevancy here. Please connect the dots for me
I personally signed up to receive Trumps Text messages but he sent out so many I stopped it because it was too much , he needs to do a once a week or once month alert
I think there is one already set up?
I think I was able to turn that one off also
Same. I vaguely remember that
If he does not want to get censored he needs to send out a one page update once a week instead of two or three times a day.
I don’t think an acting President should ever be censored to begin with.
@Repeat, you just advanced to level 11!
I agree
Maybe congress should start there. Stoping president censorship
"How the CIA made Google. Inside the secret network behind mass… | by Nafeez Ahmed | INSURGE intelligence | Medium" https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e
"In-Q-Tel – Strategic investor that accelerates the development and delivery of cutting-edge technologies to U.S. government agencies" https://www.iqt.org
"Technology Transfer | The MITRE Corporation" https://www.mitre.org/research/technology-transfer
@busillis, you just advanced to level 1!
I don’t want to limit big tech company’s freedom of speech, but I also don’t want the president to be censored. The compromise is having a presidential alert system where he updates it once a week.
He would like to censor the media when they publish his audio recordings.. grab them by the p*** , all the scientists are morons, fauci should be fire, telling his friends this is deadly stuff , etc etc..
How about no one is censored, big tech, you, me, POTUS etc. Like let’s write it into the constitution or something that says we have freedom of speech🤣
Big tech is definitely censoring our voices.
We may suspend or terminate your account or cease providing you with all or part of the Services at any time for any or no reason, including, but not limited to, if we reasonably believe: (i) you have violated these Terms or the Twitter Rules and Policies or
But freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from liability. That is if you falsely accused someone of something and that ruins a reputation then they have the ability to sue you on a court of law and seek recompense for the damage you've caused them. Social media platforms have always asserted that they are just a platform for free speech and therefore not liable for the content that speech. But when they edit content then an argument goes away.
has anyone read through the twitter Terms of service
Its their business... their policies..its like a restaurant. .. that dont want costumers with baggy pants sneakers and hats... are they censoring this kind of costumers
Agree! Absolutely. I do feel senate is beginning to narrow this argument.
it basically says they can do whatever they want
@MatiLuc restaurants aren't typically subsidized by the government to the extent big tech companies have been.
They bail out all the time
It saw someone mention it was like a Trojan horse. I do agree with that. But they shouldn’t be selectively bias. Waiting behind the trees to strike at the most important time of our country. Surely they’ll find a way to make them accountable.
The government give money to Google and FB. ?
@MatiLuc much of the technology used by the tech companies comes from government research.
That was true 30 to 40 years ago but not so much anymore
The network itself is from a DARPA project.