Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 781947523337027675
@realz I think it boils to this... Matt Braynard is asserting that he has found smoke and it is proof of a forest fire. I think based on the results that he outlined in the video, it would be more accurate to say that he found some wisps of smoke... it could be a forest fire, but it could also be a campfire.
No I don't think he said it was proof of anything
Go listen to his intro again
He says it warrants official investigation basically
And you are being unfair to him in several other ways
Like expecting him to pass your other litmus tests of null hypothesis over time (previous election) and space (other states)
He is running on money he barely managed to raise and ran out in the middlr
It is the _government_ that should be doing what _he_ is doing
This is the domain of the FBI and state officials
And your expectation of affadivits from everyone is frankly ridiculous
I agree, he said look at the evidence and draw your own conclusions
I have to choose my words more carefully.
No one wants to dox themselves for this that is a nutty expectation
> I have to choose my words more carefully.
@TaLoN132 A lot of people should think about doing that.
The IC stuff might be a valid point, I don't know enough and am willing to concede it
It is a bonus in anycase
It is not the main thrust of what he even tried to test for
How do i make this my ringtone
He sure did
Certainly that's an extremely weird thing to say
.
It could even be more strange to hear it.
'That's just how he speaks.' 'He was joking.' 'It was locker room talk.'
@realz I get the idea of trying to test a sample in order to get an idea of the whole, but I think there are logical problems with what he can draw with what they did. Sampling is a daunting endeavor with questionable reliability in the best of circumstances - take polling for instance. To get reasonably reliable data, many controls are required. Given the exceedingly short timeframe, he couldn't reasonably expected to have accomplished that. I know that he provides some qualifications at the beginning of the video and identifies some caveats throughout, but he knows that his target audience are not likely to take those into consideration. I am going to listen to the interview and see if he makes a point of qualifying his findings.
@Adam135, you just advanced to level 10!
Frankly, covfefe.
things aren't boding well for the Donald it seems
Locker room talk? I like it.
hell get'em in 4 years
I know you do.
> things aren't boding well for the Donald it seems
@Adam135 All they need is one hit in order to forget the litany of misses and get all hyper again. It doesn't even matter how important the hit is.
Trump is done. His flock will never be.
they are trying to see what sticks
Yes. Yes they are. It's all fantasy.