Message from @robxtom
Discord ID: 782622181426331688
Yet if they guy brought the claim earlier he would’ve been dismissed for lacking standing bc he wasn’t a candidate at the time of the regulation being passed. Totally political ruling it’s horrible
Yeah I agree I read the opinion I’m just paraphrasing
Maybe political, idk. But that the Trump appointee wrote the opinion was probably not mere coincidence.
Zulu. Insight on my parnell comment?
Hang on. Let me find it.
Thanks. I though as i said. It was challenging the const. Of mail in.
And was accepted. With opinion stating it might win on merrit.
Dont kbow what the relief asked was though
To me the logic to dismiss is ridiculous. Maybe I’m biased but after reading the constitution it’s seems very clear that act 77 is unconstitutional now determining a fair remedy is the issue. If the opinion was based on the claim that’s a diff story it was dismissed bc of a procedural/technicality reason that’s why I say it’s political
What about military absentee ballots though?
Looks like all the government wants Trump out office
Should we disenfranchise overseas voters?
Isn’t there a difference between Mail-in and absentee? Genuinely asking
Universal mail-in and absentee? Sure.
The military also has a few more options and extra leeway than the average person.
> Zulu. Insight on my parnell comment?
@andrasol Yes, that's the one we were talking about.
E.g: They can cast ballots before the ballots are actually printed in the state.
I don’t think that’s the same issue. Absentee military process is understood and constitutional and a small % of the votes. For the executive and judicial branches to amend the law is totally different
That’s what I mean.. I wouldn’t want to disenfranchise any overseas voters.. but the mass mail-in did seem like a problem waiting to happen..
It is a major problem, forget the constitutionality for a min. The management was inconsistent and poorly done. It’s one thing if they changed the rules and executed well, they changed the rules and it was a shit show.
Nov 28 Concurring Statement - 010782.pdf
Signature match etc, was a crazy idea in my mind 🙈
Zulu you were in the military yes?
I was.
You guys use federal forms to cast ballots overseas, yes?
FVAP yes?
Well they have to signature match military ballots too the new regs made it less stringent increasing the likelihood of fraud and mistakes
@robxtom, you just advanced to level 6!
I was never overseas during an election. Lol. Sorry.
'92 I was in Ft. Riley
New regs made it much harder to invalidate votes creating an incentive to just say fuck it out it thru and they decreased the sensitivity on the machines
https://www.fvap.gov/uploads/FVAP/Forms/fpca.pdf Ultimately, this is the general way service members vote who are overseas.
Or they can request state ballots when printed.
Put it thru*
Yeah that’s what I thought. Surely first time voters should vote in person the first time with ID? Kind of common sense 🤷🏼♀️
Yeah we should know who’s voting and making sure they’re allowed to vote. Blockchain would fix all these issues easily
@Beth only a racist would suggest that an ID be required for voting.
Hmm ill read it. But didnt the first judge had it go through?
We can have the fed issue vote coins for every election that’s tied to your ss#
Of course 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
@Beth, you just advanced to level 13!