And it sucks.

why?

After the first time, it swells, and becomes even more likely to be bit.

Lol this barely qualifies as a well staged press conference. They are trying to make it look like something it's not...and people are buying it, apparently.

What does he mean maybe they added vote counts because they were counted ahead of time

Well all judges are just using tricks to kicj em out.. so if they want to unofficialy show their "evidence"... can you blame em?

The judges are using "tricks" lol

If by 'tricks' you mean law, I guess so?

Judges and their law. Shameful.

do you realize how pathetic you guys sound? do you realize there are people doing life in prison that were convicted with less evidence than what is being shown in this hearing?

I expect all of you to champion their causes after this is over

Well... yeah but if you claim early they say no standing... if you claim after... another semi legal opinion on how they are now somehow to late?

I'm, unfortunately, unable to listen to the stream... The presence of a router does not necessarily mean a connection to the Internet - nor does it tell you what things are on the other side of the router. It is just required to have a connection to the Internet. In the days before the Internet, we still used routers believe it or not. I will listen soon and see what the context is.

since you have all changed what the definition of evidence is

every single day with you guys, the standards for what is acceptable evidence is moved

@SPEARS Is anyone cross examining the "witnesses"?

We dont say it is evidence. They say it is, we just watch and discuss

you all have moved the standards to an unrealistic point

All of this would laughed out of court. They're playing to precisely the target they need to

I have been fairly consistent

LOL you have never seen a court before

How did "we" change the definition of evidence in courts made up of Trump and Bush appointed judges? I dont even control what Obama appointed judges rule

LOL

Thats true. But they should at least get to present what they foubd in an actual court. Without it being prematurely dismissed

Hes literally reading an anonymous email

Yes. If he wants to claim tgat as proof well thats on him. At least if it got to court he would be liable

Yes, in court you have to establish things. That's why they have been getting crucified in front of actual judges. They can say anything they want here.

Wheres his trace of the origin of the email is it from Iran?

its not true and we do not exist in a world where it is true.

there are hundreds of people who have filed affadavits in multiple states, including the guy talking

They didnt work very hard to dismiss absurd affidavits

And im stating they should get a chance to present it to court...

They better hope they don't make it to an actual witness stand.

They will, most likely.

That is not what ive taken from their opinions... nor many others.

Most affidavits will not appear in court from my guess.

yes they should. if it is so easy to debunk the hundreds of sworn statements then they should

“Testimony from a witness who hasn’t penned an affidavit” 🤦‍♂️

things that are not happening for 500

Theres no such thing as a pity hearing if they bring shoddy legal work to the courts they wont be heard

you guys are extremely biased. none of you will ever sit on a jury in your life