These hearings arent penalized by perjury

Not the best method to seize power in this country. The only people buying it are those who were convinced from the start. Fake news.

https://statelaws.findlaw.com/arizona-law/arizona-perjury-laws.html

So I've done digging.

Just to be clear now it's apropos to discuss gang stalking around normal people?

So “packet traffic” but he doesn’t know if it’s dominion data going to Germany. Ok this is a joke. Another staged event for the “information war”

They arent under oath its not an official congressional function

Faithless elector laws in AZ mean that no faithless electors are allowed.

And all faithless votes are struck down, and the elector is replaced.

i was exageratting but he mentioned having nightmares of being surveyed over the internet

Glad to help, but I'm not sure which thing you are referring to....

its not about faithless electors, its about a faithless house/leg that sends electors not based on the popular vote of the state

I notice they dont explain how hackers are changing the paper trail

@TaLoN132 I thought I referenced the statement

Oh, so they're using the original definition.

Of pledge rather than popular vote.

Gotcha.

before you tuned in maw rudy was giving legal examples and precedence that the supreme court will honor the votes of electors sent by house;leg regardless of state laws

Also: Unrelated note, I've bit my lip 3 times in the same spot in the last 24 hours.

And it sucks.

why?

After the first time, it swells, and becomes even more likely to be bit.

Lol this barely qualifies as a well staged press conference. They are trying to make it look like something it's not...and people are buying it, apparently.

What does he mean maybe they added vote counts because they were counted ahead of time

Well all judges are just using tricks to kicj em out.. so if they want to unofficialy show their "evidence"... can you blame em?

The judges are using "tricks" lol

If by 'tricks' you mean law, I guess so?

Judges and their law. Shameful.

do you realize how pathetic you guys sound? do you realize there are people doing life in prison that were convicted with less evidence than what is being shown in this hearing?

I expect all of you to champion their causes after this is over

Well... yeah but if you claim early they say no standing... if you claim after... another semi legal opinion on how they are now somehow to late?

I'm, unfortunately, unable to listen to the stream... The presence of a router does not necessarily mean a connection to the Internet - nor does it tell you what things are on the other side of the router. It is just required to have a connection to the Internet. In the days before the Internet, we still used routers believe it or not. I will listen soon and see what the context is.

since you have all changed what the definition of evidence is

every single day with you guys, the standards for what is acceptable evidence is moved

@SPEARS Is anyone cross examining the "witnesses"?

We dont say it is evidence. They say it is, we just watch and discuss

you all have moved the standards to an unrealistic point

All of this would laughed out of court. They're playing to precisely the target they need to

I have been fairly consistent

LOL you have never seen a court before

How did "we" change the definition of evidence in courts made up of Trump and Bush appointed judges? I dont even control what Obama appointed judges rule