Guiliani is licensed but hasn't been to court in decades he fumbled terribly

They are currently speaking about a witness “who hasn’t given them an affidavit” not the guy next to him.

Yeah but implying he doesn't understand basic legal arguments is mildly disingenuous.

so? thats the way the game is played. you would be SHOCKED the dirty shit prosecuting attornies do, or the punches below the belt they constantly take

Guiliani asking a judge the difference between opaque and transparent and it like why cant I win these cases

That is opinion zulu... and you are not the judge last i cecked

So that’s ok to do for the Presidency of the United States?

I said terms that's not the same thing as arguments

Asking someone for their definition is a debate tactic.

@Dedkraken and @AdamS you guys are misinformed, biased, or ignorant. whatever it is you clearly don't understand how this works. maybe just listen instead of rushing in here to debunk something you know little about

Even hilary and the nyt were suggesting doing in 2016 what trump is doing now

A legal case must have merit... The problem is that with technology, most people can't distinguish between fact and fiction. Unfortunately, those of us that are technical see right through those that are not providing substance. Most of these technical "experts" appear to be using this opportunity as advertising to essentially say, "I will say anything you want me to say for a price and I will make it look good, because I know that judges and juries will have no way to prove I'm lying..."

Unless you're really under the impression that Giuliani is actually so dumb as to not know the difference between a rock and water.

"You just dont understand" pretty weak haha

I’m listening, evidently you are not seeing the merits and wish to believe what is being said. I like the evidence and this fur I have seen none, in this case they don’t even have an affidavit.

I didnt say hes dumb hes just not a good lawyer certainly objectively worse than the lawyers that quit

I dont think the statistic mumbo jumbo is gonna win anything.

Signatures and act 77. Thats where trumps chances lie imho

> That is opinion zulu... and you are not the judge last i cecked
@andrasol It is borne out by overwhelming results thus far. That's why they are doing this ridiculous 'hearing'... because judges aren't stupid. They are appealing to the public, where it's just a narrative.

And with respect you maybe misinformed or ignorant.

I think that this group are employing technical "experts" to give the appearance of merit.

Are you guys listening to the hearing?

Isnt the act 77 cases done

SIgnatures maybe... Act 77 is a dead end.

you realize the lawyers that withdrew cases only did so because the lincoln project doxxed them on twitter, and they were harrassed and threatened by BLM/Antifa??

@Zuluzeit What about that one SC NY judge that tried to threaten police?

Those 'experts' will get crucified in court.

👍

🙂

Stay honest zulu, they mostly threw em out disregaring merrit. Using standing, latches and other tricks

https://youtu.be/QfC2T7UpxkI

Does that make them bad lawyers Spear what are you getting at?

Well see, it is moving up.

If that looks good and makes the people feel good. Hearts and Minds

35k votes added to all dem candidates in Pima county

The lower dist. Court in the parnell case even said theyd prob. Win on merrits

@andrasol It's observation. Honesty has nothing to do with it.

I think it's hard for them to use Act 77 as proof that the Sec of State did not have the authority to extend the time allotted for receiving ballots postmarked by 11/3 in once case and then argue in another case before the SC that Act 77 is unconstitutional. The first suit proves that they went into the election believing that Act 77 was legal. They only decided it was unconstitutional when their guy lost. I can't see Alito hanging his legacy on that...

That act 77 nonsense is why folks dont trust GOP acting in good faith why would folks want then to have things heard in court. Dirty dirty

so you guys think that republicans are the only ones doing dirty politics in this election?

Yesterdays viva and barnes cast goes deeper into the act 77 cases (seperate cases).

Diff claims so it wont matter i think.

LOL how ignorant