yes they should. if it is so easy to debunk the hundreds of sworn statements then they should

“Testimony from a witness who hasn’t penned an affidavit” 🤦‍♂️

things that are not happening for 500

Theres no such thing as a pity hearing if they bring shoddy legal work to the courts they wont be heard

you guys are extremely biased. none of you will ever sit on a jury in your life

Thats not why they were thrown out as per the judges opinion

Not sure why they would be talking about anyone who hasn’t penned an affidavit. At this point one would think they would have witnesses sealed.

everything this man is saying you are rushing to discredit when none of you are experts in the field

True.

The judge was literally trying to help Guiliani make his case and he wasnt understanding basic legal terms they need real lawyers

what are you talking about? i read this guys' affadavit the other night

Guiliani is licensed last I recall.

I dont dispute that xD guilliani is good in PR and the telly for the fans

You do realize that the things they are claiming will be refuted in a real court, right? Witnesses witness things that involve other people (witnesses) and cameras, and don't always understand what they see. Expert opinions are subject to other experts. How are you guys still swallowing this stuff without chewing? Blows my mind.

Guiliani is licensed but hasn't been to court in decades he fumbled terribly

They are currently speaking about a witness “who hasn’t given them an affidavit” not the guy next to him.

Yeah but implying he doesn't understand basic legal arguments is mildly disingenuous.

so? thats the way the game is played. you would be SHOCKED the dirty shit prosecuting attornies do, or the punches below the belt they constantly take

Guiliani asking a judge the difference between opaque and transparent and it like why cant I win these cases

That is opinion zulu... and you are not the judge last i cecked

So that’s ok to do for the Presidency of the United States?

I said terms that's not the same thing as arguments

Asking someone for their definition is a debate tactic.

@Dedkraken and @AdamS you guys are misinformed, biased, or ignorant. whatever it is you clearly don't understand how this works. maybe just listen instead of rushing in here to debunk something you know little about

Even hilary and the nyt were suggesting doing in 2016 what trump is doing now

A legal case must have merit... The problem is that with technology, most people can't distinguish between fact and fiction. Unfortunately, those of us that are technical see right through those that are not providing substance. Most of these technical "experts" appear to be using this opportunity as advertising to essentially say, "I will say anything you want me to say for a price and I will make it look good, because I know that judges and juries will have no way to prove I'm lying..."

Unless you're really under the impression that Giuliani is actually so dumb as to not know the difference between a rock and water.

"You just dont understand" pretty weak haha

I’m listening, evidently you are not seeing the merits and wish to believe what is being said. I like the evidence and this fur I have seen none, in this case they don’t even have an affidavit.

I didnt say hes dumb hes just not a good lawyer certainly objectively worse than the lawyers that quit

I dont think the statistic mumbo jumbo is gonna win anything.

Signatures and act 77. Thats where trumps chances lie imho

> That is opinion zulu... and you are not the judge last i cecked
@andrasol It is borne out by overwhelming results thus far. That's why they are doing this ridiculous 'hearing'... because judges aren't stupid. They are appealing to the public, where it's just a narrative.

And with respect you maybe misinformed or ignorant.

I think that this group are employing technical "experts" to give the appearance of merit.

Are you guys listening to the hearing?

Isnt the act 77 cases done

SIgnatures maybe... Act 77 is a dead end.

you realize the lawyers that withdrew cases only did so because the lincoln project doxxed them on twitter, and they were harrassed and threatened by BLM/Antifa??

@Zuluzeit What about that one SC NY judge that tried to threaten police?

Those 'experts' will get crucified in court.

👍