Message from @AdvanceManExtraordinaire

Discord ID: 783039641477316618


2020-11-30 18:35:39 UTC  

Ok, so you still contest that some ballots were illegally counted, meaning they did not follow the legal procedure for doing so. What would convince you that you’re wrong?

2020-11-30 18:35:58 UTC  

The Lincoln project is rejected by both the right and the left @yetiCodes

2020-11-30 18:36:30 UTC  

I like the Lincon Project but they dont speak for me

2020-11-30 18:36:46 UTC  

Only after it accepted their donations 😂

2020-11-30 18:36:53 UTC  

Does this guy think Detroit is in Arizona?

2020-11-30 18:36:54 UTC  

And no,

2 problems were brought up with benfords law: population size mostly and some that the second digit should be used.

As extra you could use the back end of the graph.

Both were debunked by using math to increase pop. And all other sorts of checks.

Both historically as througout any stat. Test, both reps and dems are shown likely to have been cheating

2020-11-30 18:37:20 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Again that is the allegation. I have yet to see it proven. Something that is technically illegal is not evidence of fraud. Meaning a legal voter voted and it got counted

2020-11-30 18:37:30 UTC  

Did above you last mess. -.-

2020-11-30 18:38:03 UTC  

Benfords law problems arent from size of population its orders of magnitude

2020-11-30 18:38:04 UTC  

@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 10!

2020-11-30 18:38:28 UTC  

Its is not proof... no stat. Analysis is.

But if that many show anomalies... you should want to investigate. Not use that as proof. But investigate

2020-11-30 18:38:30 UTC  

Imagine thinking benfords law is still applicable. They only interesting thing is braynard but that’s only if you trust his initial data set

2020-11-30 18:38:41 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Court rulings would convince me. Then the perpetrators should be prosecuted, if their actions were illegal.

2020-11-30 18:39:03 UTC  

I’m asking what you would need to see to be convinced that there were some ballots counted illegally.

2020-11-30 18:39:04 UTC  

Again not an english speaker. Yet the point remains, it was dealt with and debunked

2020-11-30 18:39:04 UTC  

How come politicians all seek slimy as all hell?

2020-11-30 18:39:13 UTC  

Yes it shows where you want to investigate that's why they investigated to confirm why it looked like that debunking the fraud

2020-11-30 18:39:18 UTC  

@andrasol it was the GOP in Georgia and PA yet somehow Trump supporters still blame the dems

2020-11-30 18:39:51 UTC  

The signature check was dem. No? In GO

2020-11-30 18:39:51 UTC  

@andrasol, you just advanced to level 10!

2020-11-30 18:39:58 UTC  

Is it possible for votes to be counted illegally and for the justice system to not rule in such a way to acknowledge that?

2020-11-30 18:40:02 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire some proof that a ballot was fake

2020-11-30 18:40:02 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire and I'm telling you: court rulings.

2020-11-30 18:40:25 UTC  

What would proof look like to you?

2020-11-30 18:40:28 UTC  

> Is it possible for votes to be counted illegally and for the justice system to not rule in such a way to acknowledge that?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Yes.

2020-11-30 18:40:38 UTC  

Anyway, first time in this chat that no nice and polite discussion is to be had.

Im signing of. Night night guys

2020-11-30 18:40:50 UTC  

Brad raffesbberger is a republican @andrasol

2020-11-30 18:40:53 UTC  

Sounds like it’s not a very good way to determine the truth, no?

2020-11-30 18:41:28 UTC  

Thanks! That does make it interesting.

Can we agree , that whoever wanted lesser sign. Checks... is a bad person?

2020-11-30 18:41:48 UTC  

Math experts investigated the cities where they claimed benfords law displayed fraud. GOP propagandists said ignore the data in these cities in 2020 look at these other elections. That proves fraud in the cities we ignored.

2020-11-30 18:42:12 UTC  

No, cities are to small. When looking at state data it works out

2020-11-30 18:42:41 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire That's not how the burden of proof works. We don't start with the accusation and then have to prove it wrong, particularly when there have been so many that were laughable on their face. The desperation has evolved.

2020-11-30 18:42:43 UTC  

Then the other elections they looked at 🤣 were exact examples similar to where they said it should work

2020-11-30 18:42:54 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire that’s the task of the accuser to figure that out. So far everything that has been put forth are either common place or completely explainable.

2020-11-30 18:43:06 UTC  

Wait ill get you a link.

But again, nnon of this is proof, and anybody pro or contra benfords law will show it his way.

But this guy goed moat in depth, and has his data there to fact check him

2020-11-30 18:43:24 UTC  

Are these legislators at the hearing both republicans and democrats?

2020-11-30 18:43:32 UTC  

He just displayed it as proof in Arizona

2020-11-30 18:43:46 UTC  

this chat is turning into a left wing echo chamber that has very little basis in reality @here

2020-11-30 18:43:57 UTC  

You just said that it’s possible for courts to rule in a way that does not acknowledge ballots were illegally counted, even if they were.

2020-11-30 18:44:13 UTC  

thanks for pinging everyone

2020-11-30 18:44:14 UTC  

@andrasol we can only agree that this is something that was gonna happen if Trump lost , planned months in advance . We can also agree that most if these things people complain about are GOP initiated. So far this big show is a failure