@DrSammyD

Do poll workers have day jobs? Or only work during elections?

either or

If you listen to the entire affidavit testimonies, you will be highly surprised about facts that occurred.

@DrSammyD https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-georgia-rejected-ballots-fo/fact-check-georgia-rejected-ballots-did-not-go-from-4-to-almost-zero-in-2020-idUSKBN2832CM

Ive listened to way too much testimony 😄

https://bitcadia.github.io/DownBallot/GAprecincts.html

There is NO plausible way they stopped counting at 10:30

They have day jobs.

Some* (it is possible that some do not have day jobs)

What makes you think that data is accurate, I have been linked to bogus bitchute charts before. Read the article I posted @DrSammyD

Shocker... It's not likely to go anywhere. All that guy did in his video is admit to violating the chain of custody for having a copy of the blank ballot file. Those that he works for will claim that he violated protocol and he will be fired - if he actually works there. Also, remember that he is not alleging any firsthand knowledge of fraud being committed and he says that there was no vote flipping. I think it's a mixed bag for team Trump.

As a technology professional, we are entrusted with a lot of sensitive information. If I ever compromised my client's security or trust, I would be out of business immediately. This guy may be sincere, but part of a person's job is to look after the interests of your client. If he id telling the truth and he is sincere, then he should have said something about securing the ballot original file.

They got sleepy.

I made that chart

That comes directly from NYT data

Omg read this and respond do you understand the distinction @DrSammyD

Well you might have missed key info. They are long yet worthwhile, educational.

That not a how you get a accurate representation of the data as it relates to time. That is just when the nyt got data to post @DrSammyD

@TW20 in AZ like a full hour was devoted to a confused old man talking about an ominous green button that may or may not do something and 3 trays of which he didnt know the purpose but seemed suspicious and that he could clearly see strange behavior but also could not see anything. This was followed by a confused old lady who was apparently given a chair to sit in but was facing a wall and couldn't see anything and was confused as to what to do so she kept watching the wall. Followed by a lady that saw votes in envelopes maybe one envelope maybe two envelopes not sure where they were coming from or going to but all she knows it poll workers didnt have time to play 20 questions with her when they weren't supposed to be asked questions to begin with. All of which seemed to confuse not just the affidavit givers but also Giuliani and the congressfolks attending as they grilled them with further questions about what they had already said they don't know anything about

What are the prerequisite requirements in terms of employment history for poll workers?

Fuck me dude. They kept reporting it at the same rate as before the shutdown at 10:30 and almost until 3 am. It wasn't just that they had data they hadn't uploaded. It's the same incoming rate.

Address this @DrSammyD

Do you see the distinction

Jesus christ you smug little shit

Do you see the distinction or not @DrSammyD

Keep fucking posting the same thing and ignoring the point being made

they go to like churches and moose lodges and unions and such and say hey we need a bunch of bodies

I've engaged with your point. It's wanting

Just answer that question why won’t you just read that and tell me you understand the distinction,
@DrSammyD

I did

@DrSammyD ok in your own words tell me what the distinction is

Could you or somebody who knows describe this process in detail. Because i thought this event was was auto or scripted and didn't require a person to do so.

Fuck off

only a couple places described it but it probably vastly differs depending on the city or rural town its in or if theres a college nearby or whatever

The affidavit people were waiting long hours, tired and some were nervous speaking in front of a Panel of Senate and Legislators. How would the average worker do in conditions like this. They were not confused, nervous and tired, but not confused.

If you can fog a mirror you can work in a place of polling?

@james j don't waste your time he clearly doesnt understand the distinction or he now realizes his position has been refuted and is unwilling to accept that... same with that Jaaaa dude

They have to take the votes from the machine and then upload it online, it doesn’t go straight from independent, not connected to the internet , machine to being posted online @ManBearPIG

Can you be a poll worker if you have a felony?

it shouldn't have been long hours. they cant give half an hour to a person saying zero of value. thats why Michigan in a more official capacity with rules gave each person 3 minutes to say their piece and if the senators had questions they could give them. unlimited floor time with zero vetting for an unofficial nonsense created the problem

The NYT data is collected by Edison Research NEP. The process is similar to their competitor - the AP, which is organization that has been collecting election data and projecting the winner of national elections for 150 years. They have a page that details how their data is collected during election night. I should give you an idea of how NEP does it:

https://www.ap.org/en-us/topics/politics/elections/counting-the-vote

Notice that they use a combination of calling the precinct and manually entering data, scraping data from Sec of St vote total webpages, and a few direct feeds. The data is manually entered/scraped/fed into the NEP database and then they push the data to NYT.