Message from @Watching the Watchers

Discord ID: 783791298859106334


2020-12-02 20:22:02 UTC  

On merit. Lmfao

2020-12-02 20:22:33 UTC  

No offense to the maga people @abracadabra.holmes

2020-12-02 20:22:42 UTC  

Trump wants a government based on Trumpery the more you have the better you are

2020-12-02 20:22:50 UTC  

i do understand. im saying that people believe in a meritocracy and that's why they give money. because they believe that's what he's about

2020-12-02 20:22:55 UTC  

Another misleading assertion by so-called "experts. GA was compelled to complete a risk limiting audit which is a hand recount of selected random samples of ballots across all precincts. The number of ballots needed to be counted is determined by a formula based on the number of ballots cast and the margin of victory. In this case, GA would have had to "audit" 1.5M ballots. The elections officials determined that the overhead with identifying and managing a selective recount would have been more cumbersome and taken more time than a 100% hand recount. So, they decided to take that approach. Technically, it was part of the "audit" and that was how they paid for it, but it was in all aspects but name a 100% hand recount.

2020-12-02 20:22:56 UTC  
2020-12-02 20:23:08 UTC  

@abracadabra.holmes that would be misguided

2020-12-02 20:23:28 UTC  

Their money. God bless.

2020-12-02 20:23:57 UTC  

So a hand recount is better than a audit @TaLoN132

2020-12-02 20:24:26 UTC  

Audits use statistical samples, by definition, no?

2020-12-02 20:24:45 UTC  

They said only 1 small presinct counted paper ballots and showed fraud basically Talon

2020-12-02 20:24:47 UTC  

They are both hand recounts... The risk limiting audit is just a random sampling that is recounted by hand.

2020-12-02 20:25:01 UTC  

If that’s a case trump got the fairest shake in history twice @TaLoN132

2020-12-02 20:25:13 UTC  

Then they stopped taking questions lol

2020-12-02 20:25:21 UTC  

Hahahaha

2020-12-02 20:25:37 UTC  

They got what they came for.

2020-12-02 20:25:38 UTC  

Damn it Jerry you picked the smart one in the crowd

2020-12-02 20:25:56 UTC  

They arent supposed to ask us real questions

2020-12-02 20:26:03 UTC  

And lawyers making alot of money from donors to.. the more lawsuits they have the more money they will ask from the public

2020-12-02 20:26:47 UTC  

@james j i don't think that's misguided. maybe naive in some situations, sure. but it's a better model than saying america is awful, people are all racist, and there's no hope. which out of those two models is more american

2020-12-02 20:26:47 UTC  

@abracadabra.holmes, you just advanced to level 1!

2020-12-02 20:27:15 UTC  

He tried to get them to chant stop the steal and they didnt want to

2020-12-02 20:27:28 UTC  

No it’s misguided @abracadabra.holmes

2020-12-02 20:27:55 UTC  

Same kind people who give their pension checks to televangelists. It is their right to get what they deserve.

2020-12-02 20:28:09 UTC  

Trump knows he lost he is just pushing to save face and convince people there was fraud so he ha a something to talk about on Trump tv for the next 4 years @abracadabra.holmes

2020-12-02 20:28:41 UTC  

Cash grab. Murica.

2020-12-02 20:28:52 UTC  

He pretty nakedly admitted he wants the legislature to steal it ofc😅

2020-12-02 20:29:54 UTC  

Also there is a lot of hope that people aren’t racist, acknowledging that it exists however is the only way to address it. @abracadabra.holmes

2020-12-02 20:30:26 UTC  

@james j he doesn't need that to have viewership or talking points, he could just talk about biden for 4 years. what evidence do you require to say there's fraud?

2020-12-02 20:30:29 UTC  

We gave you code words to use to pretend Trump should get the electors you cant just say if we own the state we should ignore the people

2020-12-02 20:30:31 UTC  

@Zuluzeit make a go fund me for food for the homeless see how much u get

2020-12-02 20:30:57 UTC  

It’s absolutely ok for you to have your own opinion of this, which differs from mine. Is this also ok with you?

2020-12-02 20:31:36 UTC  

@james j people know it exists, it's that it's not productive to use low resolution thinking to say everything outcome and decision is racism. but if you enjoy living in a world where that's an endless excuse instead of trying to give people options

2020-12-02 20:31:48 UTC  

So what was your take on that mess Reason?

2020-12-02 20:31:57 UTC  

@MatiLuc That doesn't express enough outrage at the enemy I've been told is trying to destroy me.

2020-12-02 20:32:46 UTC  

It blows the whole weighted vote BS out the window. There is no way over come the hand recount with weighted votes.

In order for votes to have been flipped, a coordinated effort would have had to have taken place with people opening up sealed batches of tabulated ballots in each of the precincts where votes were flipped, removing the Trump ballots and replacing them with Biden ballots (presumably with no downs ballot votes), and resealing the ballots so that no one can tell that they were tampered with.

That's it... It should be really easy to prove. Recount the down ballot races. If they balance, there is no way that votes were flipped. 100% game over.

That only leaves massive mail-in voter fraud and, as we have discussed before, is a daunting effort that presumes that someone is willing to provide the address that likely leads authorities right to them.

2020-12-02 20:33:53 UTC  

She pointed out the illegal conduct that took place while acquiring the vote count. Which makes the votes illegal.

2020-12-02 20:34:19 UTC  

@TaLoN132 They are stepping beyond the pretense of requiring proof to flat out demand that they get their way.

2020-12-02 20:34:54 UTC  

Of course you nor I are the judge of this and are only left with our own opinions😁

2020-12-02 20:35:14 UTC  

@abracadabra.holmes I think that has very little to do with people giving trump money. I could have the academic conversation on racism but you just gave a very straw man explanation

2020-12-02 20:35:25 UTC  

What's your opinion though? Was this awful or did it lend them credibility?