Message from @james j
Discord ID: 784547920086696008
Uh huh, hilarious
It's just a rock solid argument to give him we blame you for Trump getting less votes and not cheating enough
You mentioned something earlier about layers of security to ensure election integrity, can you elaborate more on that
Now help us break the country
Michigan they are like the potus convinced us to kidnap you so wanna help him take an election you want another 4 years of that right
hmmm... interesting. Was contacted about a job as a remote C++ software engineer.
I really should check my email and LinkedIn more often
This guy is the new grifter on the block , look at his over sensationalist declaratory titles. Then you watch it and it’s as empty as can be. Tim pool business model works.
Easy money
Ah yes, the grifting model of bringing on people that literally hate you and think you're a grifter onto your podcast.
That’s only recently
The short 3:36 minute video in case anyone is interested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWttaCWgmns
Yeah, all I seen was a static jpg, not the video
@Maw also Tim pools fans don’t care who he brings on. They are locked in
I wouldn't paint people with such a broad brush.
I sat through about 45 seconds then closed the tab... all I heard was, "*blah blah blah blah blah blah*..."
With the will he won’t he thing he had going to the future slide down to more mainstream conservatism
Lots of Tim's viewer base disagrees with him on key points.
wat
No, your average conservative.
Not even conservative, just center-right people.
It’s either centrist right or hard right that watch his stuff. The hard right hate watches
According to what?
You?
According to the comments
Even if PA legislature decided to throw out the vote of the people, I have heard conflicting opinions as to whether it could be vetoed by the Governor. This just made me think of something else... The idea has been put forward that because the US Constitution gives the states' legislatures control over deciding the slate of electors that this exclusive authority could mean that the governor cannot impeded them. So, this means that if the state's constitution gives the governor the right to veto legislation, the state's constitution would be subordinate to the Article 2 powers given the legislature. If this is true, wouldn't the PA legislature have the authority to enact any law governing the election regardless of the PA constitution? Just a thought...
If the legislature attempted to overturn a successfully certified election, it could possibly be challenged, because the US Constitution says that state legislatures are to specify the *manner* that the electors are chosen - and that has to occur on the day the the US Congress specifies (11/3 this year). Once they establish the manner (popular vote) and the day has passed, the only way they have any more say is if it ends in a "failed" election. It's pretty vague. A couple of Textualist articles I've read indicated that this means that the manner that they prescribed "failed". In all of these states, the process has run the course and the elections have been certified as prescribed by law. Which would preclude them from asserting that the election is failed. There are some folks that think there are some cases that could be construed as saying that the legislature can decide to intervene at any time.
I like thought experiments...
Comments are hardly a judge of demographics.
You really think Tim pool isn’t a grifter have at it @Maw I’m not gonna try and convince you
Naw, I don't.
Same with the finance hub guy
Ok
Candance Owens ,Tim pool , Dave Rubin . Understand the conservative market well and just play into it.
Cool.
Hence why they are prone to the more cult like mentality as I explained the other day
Must be nice to completely dismiss people because you just presume they're grifting.
I watch his videos
I listen for language and emphasis and it’s all marketing to one group , there is no consistency of outrage
It’s clear as day