Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 784560791763550258
@james j That is half a truth, because all humans are unequal in their approach to the world and play into those more similar to us.
No, but the PA case does have a chance of being heard by SCOTUS
It was dismissed by the state supreme court on the narrowest of grounds according to Rob
Did you see my comments about that before, by chance?
Belief is the main part of being a con-man versus being wrong.
I have not, can you link them again for me?
In it for the clicks
@james j " actual actions" This sounds like a truth too. As we know it takes a court of law several days to work out a probable action.
I doubt your far right would be listening to his guest Hotep Jesus and agreeing with every word or a lesbian complaining about how the far left had marginalized and trolled her channel for not being radical left enough.
Dude was at Occupy Wallstreet, voted Obama, didn't vote (I believe in 2016), laughed when Trump won but then came to realize that Trump was up against Wallstreet as well. The bank bailouts created a movement that only just materialized in a Trump but the core principles of the movement will live on.
Again analysis that is slanted and unequal doesn’t require a contradictory belief. I’m not out here claiming David duke is a grifter @Maw
My biggest worry if Biden is eventually made president-elect (Jan 6) and President Jan 20th is that he and his projected cabinet, are very anti-2A. And so are the Dems that are in control of the house, and there are a couple of waffling Republicans in the Senate...
On top of it, there are so many irregularities with this election, that if we don't get to the bottom of its never going to get investigated and they will continue to get worse as we get farther beyond the election.
@Doc yes like when you watch someone lay down certain principles only to break them when it’s in conflict with self interest
The idea is being a grifter requires inherently being bad-faith.
You've yet to explain how Tim Pool is acting in bad-faith.
I honestly don't think you have anything to worry about... I have seen more libs change their stance on guns this year than I could have imagined.
Yeah, the people not those elected to office
@james j, you just advanced to level 28!
While claiming not to be
Which he could very well believe.
Again
His behavior should not be predictable if he truly believes what he claims
???
Did you just make the argument -- unintentionally -- that religions aren't predictable?
Limited understanding is healthy. Average people most likely would have difficulty coping with raw truth.
For a long time, gun owners have said that everyone having guns would reduce violence. Libs rejected that idea. Then the fear of what would happen if food supplies were compromised during the pandemic set in and they saw the light... And then... they figured out that shooting is really fun. Soon, all tags will be lotteries and you'll be wishing libs went back to hating guns. 😄
Like for example would he ever being up a purely left wing article legitimately attacking the right and then title his videos accordingly. @Maw and then talk about it for like 3 hours
No he would never do anything to Rock the boat of his base. Especially before Trump lost
@james j I'm going to use an analogy that sort of was just brought up by Doc. Just because you believe you're incredibly intelligent, doesn't mean you are.
Regardless of his motivations, it sounds like good business to me.
Truth or constructed realities?