@Doc Is it the TMI or insults?

TMI?

Too much info

both

"How do you feel today?"
"I want to strangle a nurse!"

Which is utter doodoo as the recoil resets the trigger mechanism which is completely different than a full-auto trigger mechanism.

"I will be your doctor during this stay"
"Not true. The use of genetive suggests ownership. My surroundings indicate I am the one being owned"

Just joined the discord, introduction Hi.

@IamFLAGG welcome, mr. Flagg

A bump stock is an Aid to pull the Trigger. It does not change the Trigger Mechanism.

or mrs

it is also an aid to lose aim

Absolute truths outside the brain and various ways in which it can be obfuscated, misconstrued, reconstructed, and intentionally or non-intentionally applied before being processed within.

I can only imagine... I don't have to deal with that very often so its not as big of a deal. And since there are times I show signs of falling on the spectrum, its something I also ignore most of the time.

@inwa still not entirely true. Your brain can absorb data that constitutes fractions of a truth. And those data will mostly be contaminated by artifacts.

A truthful statement is not necessarily accurate.

Talking about honest lies

A Lie requires Intent.

I understand your concerns and, unfortunately, I don't know how to bridge the divide on this one, so I will think it out. Both sides ultimately want the same thing: to live their lives without fear of random violence, provide for our families, leave a better world for our kids, etc. Nobody should have a problem with law abiding citizens owning guns, if that's what they want.

I think there has always been a limit on the types of weapons citizens can own (i.e. bombs, chemical weapons, nuclear weapons, etc.) So, I would have to imagine that there is somewhere between AR's and Nukes that is an acceptable limitation. We just need to figure out what that line is, quantify it, and set it in stone.

I also think education will be key. The state requires a certain amount of training in order to drive - is there a minimum amount of education that we can agree on that the state can require before a person can own a gun? Some countries with permissive gun laws mandate comprehensive training.

Is this a ridiculous approach?

Absolutely correct... its a great way to expend a lot of ammo and lose tons of accuracy. I personally think they are completely stupid but that doesn't mean that they are machine guns. but that is how the bATFe reclassified them for banning.

A = A is both true and accurate. But that is probably the kind of models we are speaking of.

How did the MSM try to "dispell" and "debunk" the #SuitcaseGate video???

@AntiFish03 if I am to be shot at in the future, I prefer someone with a bump stock over someone with a nice aim and semi automatic.

Especially at a Distance.

@William Dinan, you just advanced to level 8!

https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1334982225088159744 : PA legislator sent letter to congress to reject their electoral college

The problem with those laws and what they push is that it leads a diminishment of unalienable rights. (in the case of the 2nd Amendment its the tools to protect oneself from an aggressor). Firearms are currently the greatest equalizer in a disparity of physical capabilities. you don't have to be excessively strong. or super quick and agile, to wield a firearm in a defensive manner.

"unailenable rights" always sounded to me like a challange. "Hold my beer!"

Do you limit someones right to vote, or speak because they don't have formal education? Do you limit a persons ability to speak because they didn't get a permissions slip from the government?

Like swimming with jellyfish? Free will in a free market is dangerous? Or possibly harmless depending of environment?

Im not sure what you mean. The will is also a product of data absorbed, so the term "free" isnt really applicable.

it is neither free, nor caged. It just is.

General thoughts, the importance of legitimacy has been expressed for the SCOTUS. How much concern for legitimacy should/would the court consider for other branches in a decision?

The executive branch doesn’t need convincing

What is the latest? 0

Your meme could be considered either way without understanding intention.

Also the limits on what a private citizen could legally own is less than 100 years old (National Firearms Act of 1934).

@inwa Oh, that was what you meant. 😄 Sorry. It derives from a discussion of free will in which we ended up finding that if humans have free will, so does jellyfish. And since a free market is dependent on a free will, the sea would be a free market.

Probably posted before

It already is! Just ask Asean nations of the South China Sea! Lol

🙂