Red Flag, universal background checks, ammo bans, Semi-automatic rifle bans, magazine capacity limits...

@inwa No, like in russian. Gitler Kaputt.

none of these has changed anything in any state that has them

Hello

Is guliani not working for Trump who is in power? if Dan bongino not also tied? This is good @inwa

and they won't... add additional penalties to crimes committed with firearms

You work for or with the government you are subject to transparency @inwa

make the penalties more hash and pretty soon criminals will either be incarcerated, or avoid using firearms in the commission of their crimes

I'm pretty certian there are plenty of felons who voted for Biden...the same guy who put them in the pin after importing drugs, creating an epidemic and declaring war on the poor! The insanity!

@skye hello, skye

@AntiFish03 elect congress people who make pushing that kind of legislation a priority

Also, that list of proposed gun control is already possible with the current laws. While respecting due process, and property rights.

That's who I voted for.

People to make government more transparent? @AntiFish03

Citizens cannot yell fire in a theater but our govt surely can start one, incite a revolution and overthrow a Shaw for British oil destabilizing an entire region for decades though. Sound familiar?

You might want to find to look at my reply to that if you missed it about fire in a theater https://discord.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/784582827823988756

Not something that most politicians talk about... I was meaning firearms wise...

I was responding to the thing about government being resistant to passing legislation for transparency. @AntiFish03 it would require a bipartisan effort to prioritize that to make legislators campaign on that front

Gun laws only affect law abiding citizens. And even with the death penalty, criminals still tend to use firearms.

Agreed, its something I'd love to see. Better transparency in our government

Agreed for the most part. But stiffer penalties means that they are at least incarcerated for longer. And not in our society.

I'm not advocating for gun control. I was trying to see if there was a way to bridge the gap. It was a thought experiment. Where is the reasonable limit on what kind of weapon can or cannot be owned by a citizen? If there is one.

Sensible and responsible appraoch to gun ownership just like including in womens rights access to a safe abortion via allowing MD hospital privlages while also giving her the weighted knowledge of her decision and allowing time for a sensible and responsible decision. Perhaps gun rights should be allowcated to the state.

@inwa, you just advanced to level 10!

Safe abortion is a relative term

There are some who believe only muskets are allowed as that was the common firearm of the time. By that standard, only the written or printed word would be permissible under the 1st amendment, all other forms such as texting, internet, cellular, etc would be restricted or banned.

@Bey, you just advanced to level 15!

I was using a quick shorthand. I am aware that it is not an apt analogy, I was being lazy.

Making something a crime is a way of enforcing an established limit.

@TaLoN132, you just advanced to level 27!

A limit that is predicated on a person abusing a right, not a limit on everyone who isn't abusing the right

Oh, great. Doc is at a Russian click-bait farm also in collusion with Biden, tampering with elections and spreading massive disinformation. Russia is the "fire in the crowded theater" only this time the Dems have cried wolf for so long, the wolf has easy access. Sadly, RT is what Western media used to look like. Unbiased, fact-based journalism.

Those fraudsters dare to rig the election because they trust Americans want more their social life and networks accounts than their freedom and democracy.

You would have to read the papers to better understand, but either way...whatever we were doing in Ukraine (whether sound or not) multimillions to the son sitting on the board of Burisma and a legit Quid Pro Quo is extortion and criminal.

Would imagine they are highly transparent to their own.

What I am getting at is that there are other areas where we have figured out how someone can own what they want and use it in a manner that is consistent with societal norms. For example, we don't prevent people from owning cars that can go 200+mph and they can drive them as long as they abide by the rules of the road. They can go to a race track and let loose, of course.

@inwa I dont think a troll farm can afford me. My rate starts at 120 USD/hr

Maybe a troll farm leader?

Or troll trainer?

Troll SF?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NnCbkIowDw

I did see that but overthrow of the Shaw began with a fire in a theater ironically.