LOL - I've lost almost all of my business (small - sideline) because an "expert" in my industry is far-left and decided to call me out publicly on Facebook.

Didn’t those ballots only net like 1000 votes for trump? There were Biden ballot in those finds as well. That’s actually less than the Florida recount in 2000 where they went from like a 2000 ballot difference to 300 @Recalibar

And I'm actually an Independent who voted for Trump because the way the Democrats are headed scares the stuffing out of me. Especially after they've been infringing on people's rights constantly since mid-March.

Right right. I brought up how there were supposed to be some 20% reporting for Floyd county, and that number dropped to like 91% with no votes added. The margin was supposed to be more narrow, and indeed it was.

Oh those internet percentage things are never accurate

In general

It was narrow by like 1000 votes

Why did Trump pick Guliani.. there have to be better lawyers that he could have bought

Maybe, but I didn't make any other claims about missing votes because I didn't really catch any. All of a sudden I'm a conspiracy theorist for bringing up something that came up rather plainly in my data, and even turned out to be right.

My understanding is that they are just keeping tabs. There is some combination of the Chief Justice and a certain number of Justices needing to accept the case, but I do not know what those criteria are off the top of my head.

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1335331233706856448?s=20

does anyone know what this refers to?

I voted for Bernie back in 2016 primary, and felt like throwing a vote for Trump in because I was angry that leaks were coming out about how the DNC wanted their darling Clinton in instead.

I know they were doing the ballot duplication study that found a 3% swing

I'm looking for more context or the origin of this audit^^^

Big if true.

They all knew that fraud is always committed. They just have to meet the threshold allowed.

does anyone have a link for the specific case or court docs?

I found this article very informative and it makes sense to me. The author seems legit by his bio page, but that's the extent of what I know: https://www.justsecurity.org/73274/no-state-legislatures-cannot-overrule-the-popular-vote/

Would like this as well.

Saved for later reading

@MatiLuc @JonasRobert @james j I posed a thought experiment and people have been sharing their ideas. I have enjoyed the resulting conversation - I hope they have. If you are interested, it is here: https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/784832307219136612

Imo, I think the situation is different when the state legislators are sufficiently convinced of wrongdoing. That's more or less what Guliani is currently doing by lobbying the legislatures.

@Recalibar, you just advanced to level 6!

@TaLoN132 loves to phish ?

I have been working from home for a long time. I didn't realize how much I missed having adult conversations.

I'll second @DisenchantedTruth 's take, great points made.

@TaLoN132 working from home can sux.

Where are the affidavits regarding the GA counting scandal? The ones claiming they were told to leave?

I can try to find them, give me a bit.

@TaLoN132 that is why god created offices

Oh thank you. I was looking myself.

I like it... I used to spend 3-4 hours a day on the road - sometimes more depending on meetings and traffic. SoCal is so spread out.

For years, as spent as much time in my car as I did with my (awake) kids - on the days I went into the office.

DedKraken shared this link last night, in case anyone missed it: https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/12/fact-check-video-from-ga-does-not-show-suitcases-filled-with-ballots-pulled-from-under-a-table-after-poll-workers-dismissed.html

I don't mind working away from home, i just hate driving around...each time i start and stop i loose something or fear that i will.

Just checked Kelli Ward's Twitter. Surprised she hasn't mentioned it.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18694655/pearson-v-kemp/ I believe these are the ones referenced.

I have nothing to link you to....but a court ordered a small sample 100 ballots be verified. 3% of those were duplicated in error. So a larger sample was ordered 2500 ballot. If you look in the comments, that 11% seems to be signature match issues...and 0.5% of the ballots were duplicated in error.

Any word on if they all go one direction?

Ward released a press statement that they only got through half the stack anyway, before the court ordered ruling to continue, if I remember correctly.