Etc.

so far we haven't seen compelling evidence for "massive" and absent of that you're not going to see state legislatures overturning the popular vote

Well, that isn’t up to us fortunately. Just have to convince the Supreme Court and a couple of legislatures. No easy task but they will have all the best evidence on the table at that time.

I run into that argument...so yes, I can see that people are saying that fraud proven in what, 6? 8? cities isn't "massive"....but it was enough to tip an entire election and affect every citizen of the USA.

And THAT makes fraud in those few cities become massive.

Personally I wouldn’t expect them to find wrongdoing but ultimately a judge or the legislature may disagree. If there is a demonstration of being misled by the government. We got a long drawn out case ahead of us either way.

I felt the same way....why not have someone impartial investigate?

The problem is that significant fraud has been proven in zero cities... There have been accusations, allegations, and disparagement... but nothing has been proven yet.

Scratch this, I didn't catch it again.

I mean, if I've committed a crime or one of my employees committed a crime that will come back to bite me in the butt....SURE, PLEASE let me investigate that crime for you. I assure you, there will be no crime committed to bite me in the butt at the end of my investigation.

Has anyone explained the data? Has anyone explained the votes that were switched from Trump to Biden or just removed all together?

Nothing has been disproven yet either though. We want this to be figured out now but unfortunately those saying they know one way or the other are at the same level of credibility.

Because in PA alone, that's about 1 million votes back to Trump and 220,000 down for Biden.

Except - Sterling and Raffensperger would be national heroes if they proved fraud and flipped GA back to Trump... Demigods in Georgia.

I went through all of that data myself and do still have that one my computer.

Plenty of people explain the data. Lot of footprints but nothing truly proven in court of law yet.

Unless they made money to allow this to happen. And we all know politicians are easy to pay for.

Democracy docket's policy seems to push for "Dismiss dismiss dismiss." so evidence is never really reviewed in those cases.

I want to opt out of socialism, house on fire, no fire department, no water or sewer processing please...

How else are we supposed to get the child laborers to the coal mines without any government roads?

*/s*

Me too, I will be your neighbor and help you if its on fire.

@Corndog, you just advanced to level 2!

And no one has come out and said "This is why those 18,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden" or this is why those "32,000" votes just disappeared from Trump's total.

Not a single explanation has been given as to WHY it's there.

Just export them to china! Lol

Aye. Lot of people explain it away as normal.

Right but if you can't tell me why it's "normal" I can't accept as normal. I'm not a coder now but I once was....machines do not do that in "normal" operation.

They can only follow the instructions you given them.

Its just a glitch get over it. Lol

It has happened in other elections, when the Dominion software was also used. Lmao.

So, it's normal for anyone that has a Smartmatic portion of their backbone software...

Which still doesn't make it acceptable to me.

That's the conclusions being made by Team Trump. It's normal... if you're using Smartmatic.

Define proven there's been no fraud proven in a court of law

That's what we're all waiting for, isn't it?

Scanning same stack of ballots 3x

So are we just going to claim rescanning ballots doesn't matter? They have barcodes and all is fine?

When in the world are we ever going to get to a real trial if they

1) Won't allow us to bring real witnesses forward due to time constraints

and

2) Exclude the witness affidavits we have because the witnesses themselves didn't testify

I mean, that it literally what just happened in NV

And all over the place.

Can't keep telling us we don't have proof when we're never allowed to present the proof and not have it excluded for some ignorant technical thing....