"So... this should have happened in 2016, too... The margins were even tighter. Would you have been as supportive of this effort if the Dems had control to dictate that outcome?" - You. In the post I quoted / responded to.

a 911 system upgrade that turns your mobile device into a surveillance platform, with all sensor access, what could go wrong?

Margins was the wrong word... I meant that Trump won by fewer total votes in the battleground states that he flipped to win.

Again - I was not focused on the .5% number that you were asserting. I didn't see that as a hard number. Just that being a close race shouldn't be the bellwether for US Congress intervening.

from who's perspective?

...the most important election in 75 generations...

Caller and all others in radius x ?

I'm open to that being the case, but being within the margin of error is what I'm talking about (error could be any ballot counted illegally, not necessarily fraudulent) causing the election to be in doubt. And it needs to be challenged by either party.

Also, they literally challenged recounting in MI in 2016, but they stopped at the behest of the Democrats who started to get cold feet.

https://www.universetoday.com/141536/this-star-has-been-going-nova-every-year-for-millions-of-years/

https://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/RecurrentNova.html

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/the-recurrent-exploding-nova-r-aquarii-unlucky-stars

https://www.sciencealert.com/astronomers-have-just-watched-a-nova-go-from-start-to-finish-for-the-first-time

https://www.nature.com/articles/157270d0

https://phys.org/news/2019-02-lmc-s154-symbiotic-recurrent-nova.html

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2013IAUS..281...80J

aa10678-08.pdf

Does it keep exploding and reforming because the cloud has a gravitational pull great enough to keep the material from achieving escape velocity?

Just thought I would drop this here. Not sure if this nonsense about suitcases full of ballots is still being thought of as credible... its not.
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1336045566648852480

https://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/outreach/events/58/

That seems improbable...

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1336056059170070541

So they didn't continued counting?

Sterling is a bit of a moron. Also, the guy who started the "that's not credible" nonsense later said he didn't even watch the video..

Ask yourself? Self how many stars Nova recurrently?

watch the video

The gist of the investigation is ballots are verified as legal votes then opened and separated from the envelope and put in sealed ballot containers. They know how many total votes there should be and how many were opened and how many were counted. When workers were hitting the 16 hour mark and were too tired to not make mistakes identifying voters they were sent home. 5 workers and 1 neutral observer as required by law were left behind to feed the remaining naked ballots through without opening new ones. GOP observers and the news misconstrued and left on their own accord. Leaking water never had anything to do with it.

Someone posted a video in this group claiming that a stack of ballots were ran several times... I dont recall the number, but at least 3 was the claim. If that was the case then the hand count would have been off.. way off. It wasnt.

When are you folks gonna believe facts over Ripping Rudy's odious claims?

Two new Amicus briefs were posted for tomorrow's SCOTUS case... One for each side.

He doesnt personally investigate hes in charge of dozens of investigators

no I meant from the system's perspective whatever goes wrong they'll just fix later ... from the user's perspective it's already gone way wrong to get to this point

Do you know who filed them?
Also, did the Repsondents get their Response filed? Ive been working today and havent got to look at much

It would have been off without a hand count.

Yes. But since GA actually had a hand count of the ballots that establishes that it would have been absolutely impossible for that count not to have caught stacks of ballots being scanned several times.

@Dedkraken ... I get that you are saying that it would have been caught much sooner and easier than having to do a hand recount.... but I am just trying to lower any confusion

Yeah but additionally theres a count of raw number of votes along the process so you cant ballot stuff without red flags. They dont want like 10k votes popping up to only appear in a hand count audit because those arent always done

Exactly.... I

Just in this case additional verification was done

Right

If you rescan ballots and then bring in more to make up the difference. Which there's testimony saying that unsealed ballots were being brought into the recount.

Hand count was not necessary to determine if ballots had been scanned more than once.... that would have been caught within a day of the polls closing as they just do their standard review for certification. But we also have the additional step in GA where they actually counted the ballots by hand

It's very bad for freedom, especially when the company who designs the system is run by former intelligence service staff and was funded by a reputed pedophile who videotape people to blackmail them. This is not a conspiracy theory.

Bob Barr, says deploy it now.

If you need to tell yourself it's a conspiracy theory to make it through, more power.