It's going to likely lead to some sort of conflict.

I mean I did call him a tool before that.

Yes, which you 100% shouldn't have done.

Seriously @Maw It was in response to him calling me a Tool and telling me to F-off, and Shut the F-Up...

Dirty trumpet as bad as well?

What is this Twitter now? Censorship. What do you call a trump supporter other than a trump supporter?

@TaLoN132 You could have asked me to intervene. I'd much prefer that then continuing down the road of mud-slinging.

Is that better or worse than a rusty trombone

We need more moderators here, ones without personal opinions.

Republican

What mudslinging? He had taken a Pro-Trump stance on a series of issues. It was not meant as a pejorative. People use that term all over this site.

Sorry, I'm a fan of polemics, but I'll refrain.

Name 1 other than election fraud

Thank you.

Trombones are quite large, with that I guess it depends on one's perspective and threshold for pain.

Just triggered me with Republican.

Thank you... I learned something new. I had to look up the meaning.

You’ll be okay 🙃

Not all supporters of Trump are supporters of the Republican Party.

👍

Personal Attacks only Highlights the weak merits of your position or debate!

Okay then, on the right / centre right

Now we have political party appropriation...

Disagree, they draw attention.

What could go wrong.

I’m pretty sure Rob calls trump supporters “trump supporters”

If someone appears to be angry with you, the last thing you generally want to do is make them more angry.
> "I love it... Every time when faced with logic - Trump supporters resort to name calling."
This isn't exactly a comment you make in neutrality.

Adams That is not possible, everyone has a personal opinion, what you seek is perhaps an Android or some type of A.I. but then again, that would have to be programmed by a human who has a personal opinion

@DrSammyD Yes. To the Person making the Personal Attacks?

You are right. We just need more moderators.

Trumps speeches are so sad now he cant talk about anything without talking about Biden trouncing him

Don't drag ML into in.

Yes, but finding one who is unbiased and 100% objectionable ?

I’ll let the powers that be decide that one.

They drive engagement. A Person cannot be both passionate and nuanced. I find bringing passion, and then drawing it back to nuance will make people more likely to come to some sort of agreement. It relives tension. Especially if you give them an out later on. @JD~Jordan's argument with me about claiming to be done a few nights ago with me is a prime example.

If you disagree with my takes, I'm more than open to discussing them further and willing to potentially change my mind if you bring forth a good enough argument. If you don't like the way I moderate, that's fine. If you think it's detrimental to the way the channel functions, by all means I implore you to discuss your objections with Faith.

Process vs Function.

Duly noted. Thank you.

Do you discuss objections with faith by praying to God?

You're welcome.

What are blathering on about now?