Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 785989137659592735
Play instruments
Texas RN
Poor Trigger Control!....lol
@Recalibar here's the thing attorneys typically won't take junk cases even if you pay them.
Kelly's team just posted their reply to the Response: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20A98/163095/20201208154754981_Reply%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Emergency%20Application%20for%20Writ%20of%20Injunction%20with%20Supplemental%20Appendix.pdf
What's the end game?
And yes a proven track record of junk?
What about state attorney generals?
Normally with no political ax to grind or gain, no.
We have the former in the latter
Hey yall what's the deal with TX suing PA and like I forgot, WI and like 5 other states ❓
The latter for sure.
anyhow just thought I'd ask, enjoying yalls convo
Apparently electorate desires are moving the needle, too bad it doesn't happen typically.
They argue the potential for fraud undermines the constitution and the will of their voters, and that the allegations should be investigated before the election moves forward, because the will of their voters are undermined by fraud in the system.
colloquialisms are strong with @skeeterburke.
It may be theater, of sorts... If the plan is to challenge the electors sent from these states in January in order to prevent Biden from reaching 270, this is potentially part of making that case. They will petition the US SC to invalidate those election results, with little chance of success. Then, when January 7 rolls around, they will challenge the votes and point to being forced to do so because SCOTUS failed to act.
What's your prediction in terms of outcome?
The only end game I see is blowing up the party, the GOP
I'm working on my fortune teller thing, perhaps I have way too much time on my hands.
Louisiana just joined Texas's lawsuit.
I think they will debate whether it is worth risking the EC to try. My guess is that not all Republican Senators will go along with stealing the election for Trump. If they try anyways and fail, that will give fuel to those that want to abolish the EC. They only need a few more states to sign onto the idea of dedicated their electors to the winner of the popular vote and we will have a de facto popular vote. The thought of possibly being beholden to the popular vote might prevent them from even trying. It will be interesting to see just how this plays out.
If they didn't want to weigh in on the PA case directly, I can't imagine they will want to do it this way.
@busillis did the SC accept the Texas Case?
That I don't know.
I need to go find a Starbucks.
I need to see a shrink!
I need a rusty trumpet.
Yes, they did
If this goes on much longer will all need to seek professional psychiatric help, if we didn't already. Paternalistically speaking of course.
@Cali La La I think they would have to if there is an Intervening Party now.
In a nutshell Texas claims the defendant States broke nuanced rules within their own State election law/regulation, and in turn broke federal law?
hi guys question WITCH SCOTUS court case was was it that that rejected as there are a few Pennsylvania cases before the supreme Court of the United atates
Basically yes
But they actually broke their own states laws...
If the high court rules against Pennsylvania it's all over for Mr Biden.
The Supreme Court rejected their claim
That doesn't bode well for Trump.
Nope NOT AT ALL. you are so so incorrect