@TaLoN132 you try VERY hard to represent China, if your not yet being paid, you should ask for it

> There have been dozens of cases filed. If the democrats were interested in free, transparent elections, and “healing” the nation, they would allow republicans to collect forensic evidence and present their case in court. Simple, but they of course are scared.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire lol. They have been dead silent. That is not by accident. You'll know when they are fighting it.

Its Trumps legal teams job to present a real case. It's not Democrats job to let them steal an election. What are you suggesting they do?

Why would they fight having a free and transparent election process?

@Repeat keep ur friends close and your enemies Closer

> Why would they fight having a free and transparent election process?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Dunno. Good thing they aren't.

Allow the republicans the opportunity to present their case for election fraud. If there is no fraud, the outcome won’t change. Why is this hard to accept?

Name one citizen controlled through Socialism??? That makes no sense whatsoever? It is BS fearmongering. Name 1 law that China has rewritten... one. Name one amendment to the US Constitution that China had anything to do with. Name one proposed amendment to the Constitution that China has influenced. Show me evidence of any politician that is working with China.

Stories on social media might not be the ideal source for constructing your convictions.

Socialism conflicts with capitalism. That makes perfect sense

What about stories under oath?

They can't get the evidence to prove anything because it takes a court order to even see the election data and even if they could it might be very difficult to prove one way or another.

It seems to be the popular method these days.

Wtf does that mean? Lawsuits do let then present their case. They failed. They arent going to just let Trump win. They dont control Trump appointed judges. Whatever fiction is in your head is not reality.

> Allow the republicans the opportunity to present their case for election fraud. If there is no fraud, the outcome won’t change. Why is this hard to accept?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Courts have rules. They don't jettison procedure just because people are hyper from a disinformation campaign.

They aren't arguing fraud

@Dreadnaught, you just advanced to level 6!

They’ve been denied in FULL the legitimate due process and appellate rights!

Are you illiterate?

Hahahaha

Can you name one instance in which the republicans were granted a hearing in which both sides got to cross examine witnesses testifying to fraud under oath?

Lol

> Can you name one instance in which the republicans were granted a hearing in which both sides got to cross examine witnesses testifying to fraud under oath?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire I wish they would but you definitely wouldn't like it.

I presume, as an advocate for following the rules, you would throw out any mail in ballots that were unconditionally authorized then.

Bullshit they never had a case. What are Democrats supposed to do? Switch sides so competent lawyers are on both sides of the courtroom? Teach Guiliani how to win a case? How are Democrats stopping them from presenting a real case?

a hearing is where one side presents evidence in another one comes up with legal arguments to debunk said evidence or have a thrown out on a technicality, the judge makes the call. If I am incorrect please let me know.

You have not been paying attention. I have advocated bringing ALL US manufacturing home. We pay an exorbitant amount each year to police the Pacific shipping lanes. If corporations who manufacture in China had to pay for protecting the shipping lanes, there is no way that it would be cost effective for them to manufacture in China over the US. People here get sidetracked with BS issues and miss the big stuff. We incur massive deficits each year and add to our national debt to keep cheap goods made in China cheap. It's ridiculous.

You’d have to!!!

Arizona

They should cross examine Melissa Carone. I’d pay to watch that!

So you're saying the United States uses its military forces to protect the racquets of corporate bosses, paid for by everyday Joe and janes, as corporations do not pay tax.

I like it.

Interesting... You don't dispute that what I said was true. Because you can't. You instead accuse me of "getting paid". It's a clear indication of not being on the side of a supportable position when you have to attack someone that doesn't agree with you.

But let's be honest azriona aside if the opposing counsel can show your "experts" are unqualified and refused to use industry standard methods and refused to show their methodology you shouldn't be pretending they are actual legitimate evidence to begin with.

If you're getting paid please let me know how I can get paid as well. Tks up front.

They did ask her questions she failed then all especially the one disproving her entire testimony 😂

@TaLoN132 we need a complete ban on anything made in China. They need our food, we don’t need their poison like baby food, drywall, dog food and cheap disposables and unreliable products. They’re also allowed to steal our technology because corrupt politicians encourage AND allow it. They pass laws to protect China. Look at the voting history of each bill. It tells a compelling story

I may be late in the game catching up on politics, but it doesn’t mean I will swallow any BS thrown at me

Please explain how Socialism conflicts with Capitalism... How would having a public option or Universal Healthcare prevent you from making money? How does paying our teachers, firemen/women, police, sanitation workers, transit workers, etc. which are arguably social services - make it harder for companies to make a profit? These are all part of our mixed economy and it works. So tell me how your statement makes perfect sense?

I'd start a GoFundMe to have Democrats finance sending Trumps crack legal team back to law school to figure out how to make a winning lawsuit but I'm pretty sure they got enough millions of dollars already off this scam

I’m not sure what you’re referring to. Are you cherry picking testimonies that had issues? Was this under oath?