Message from @JonM16
Discord ID: 786274587767341126
Alaska should join
All voting areas should join if we are to be a fully functioning Democracy
Remember it is impossible to “prove” election fraud without having a hearing in court where both sides get to cross examine witnesses under oath. If you don’t allow the hearing, you can’t have the “proof”. That is the DNC strategy.
This Texas thing is going to sting when they refuse to hear it.
I didn’t say you encouraged communism but you did seem to embrace socialism for citizens by echoing that our military is operated this way. I will again say, it’s NOT ok for citizens to be controlled through socialism. This is a loss of freedoms. China HAS been been influential in us rewriting our laws to benefit themselves. More and more evidence is revealed daily regarding China’s control over our politicians and that these politicians ARE being paid by China!
I hope PA, GA, and the other states counter sue Texas for their blatant voter suppression tactics leading up to the election. I think it would be appropriate and poetic. Texas did not hide their efforts to make it more difficult for people vote in the election. As opposed to phantom, disproven claims of election fraud, there is ample actual proof of Texas voter suppression.
Already on the docket comrade.
I’m not paying my politicians to accept bribes and represent anyone’s best interest but my own. I’m paying politicians to represent me!
It's a political hot potato loaded with dynamite, I wonder if these courts would take it if there was smoking gun evidence.
You cant get a hearing if you have no case to present. Are you suggesting Democrat lawyers lose intentionally to give you a chance to try and steal an election? Or are the judges supposed to treat their case as more than it is?
And how much have you been paid? Curious
> Already on the docket comrade.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire I don't think you know what that means. 'On the docket' doesn't mean they will agree to actually hear it.
Say goodbye to Section 230 then. I see they prefer to act as a Publisher and not a Platform
I know a couple of attorneys that have become judges, oddly enough their fathers before them were judges, legacy.
When I say no I mean know them personally.
The system is rotten from stem to stern.
There have been dozens of cases filed. If the democrats were interested in free, transparent elections, and “healing” the nation, they would allow republicans to collect forensic evidence and present their case in court. Simple, but they of course are scared.
It's already docketed.
If these cats are great legal minds I certainly don't see it.
@TaLoN132 you try VERY hard to represent China, if your not yet being paid, you should ask for it
> There have been dozens of cases filed. If the democrats were interested in free, transparent elections, and “healing” the nation, they would allow republicans to collect forensic evidence and present their case in court. Simple, but they of course are scared.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire lol. They have been dead silent. That is not by accident. You'll know when they are fighting it.
Its Trumps legal teams job to present a real case. It's not Democrats job to let them steal an election. What are you suggesting they do?
Why would they fight having a free and transparent election process?
> Why would they fight having a free and transparent election process?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Dunno. Good thing they aren't.
Allow the republicans the opportunity to present their case for election fraud. If there is no fraud, the outcome won’t change. Why is this hard to accept?
Name one citizen controlled through Socialism??? That makes no sense whatsoever? It is BS fearmongering. Name 1 law that China has rewritten... one. Name one amendment to the US Constitution that China had anything to do with. Name one proposed amendment to the Constitution that China has influenced. Show me evidence of any politician that is working with China.
Stories on social media might not be the ideal source for constructing your convictions.
Socialism conflicts with capitalism. That makes perfect sense
What about stories under oath?
They can't get the evidence to prove anything because it takes a court order to even see the election data and even if they could it might be very difficult to prove one way or another.
It seems to be the popular method these days.
Wtf does that mean? Lawsuits do let then present their case. They failed. They arent going to just let Trump win. They dont control Trump appointed judges. Whatever fiction is in your head is not reality.
> Allow the republicans the opportunity to present their case for election fraud. If there is no fraud, the outcome won’t change. Why is this hard to accept?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Courts have rules. They don't jettison procedure just because people are hyper from a disinformation campaign.
They aren't arguing fraud
@Dreadnaught, you just advanced to level 6!
They’ve been denied in FULL the legitimate due process and appellate rights!
Are you illiterate?