Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 786460275234701324
From the data I found, the number of total votes cast in the election increased by 26,664,915 from 2016 [Trump v Clinton] Like 21% increase. That is a LOT of new votes
Indeed. And still far below eligible voters.
~65% of eligable voters
@SassyCate Yeah, but that's not demonstrative. Maybe we just got a lot of newly motivated votes. So an example of demonsterative might be : https://rumble.com/vb2xn1-evidence-of-trump-votes-switched-to-biden-a-high-level-walkthrough.html
@SassyCate Sounds about right.
I'm talking about the whole population (50 states) Not just the states with alledged fraud.
wow!
@SassyCate, you just advanced to level 2!
CCP Dont play!
Now we're back to alien interference?
Pretty much.
If you like your Cthulhu alien mythology you can keep your Cthulhu alien story
It seems they have bought the Dems, Fake news, Big tech, and a few in the GOP Im afraid...
@busillis !?!?!? CCP = Chinease Communist Party
I'm going to defer to the highly motivated voter conspiracy theory, with no tangible evidence to suggest otherwise.
Chinese Communist party officials would be considered alien if not naturalized.
@busillis I just gave tangible evidence --- https://rumble.com/vb2xn1-evidence-of-trump-votes-switched-to-biden-a-high-level-walkthrough.html
@busillis I have more, just haven't uploaded it from my private server to my public yet
Maybe it's a mixture of fake news peddled to credulous people and a whole lot more motivated voters.
Watch Tucker Carlson from last few nights
And I agree highly motivated voters newly minted voters lots of would-be organizers sitting around during the lockdown recruiting highly motivated voters
I thought Tucker Carlson was cancelled as a heretic. Good for him hanging in there.
@SassyCate Tucker is NOT tangible evidence. This is where you're shoot our cause in the foot. Forensice analysis shows votes were electronically changed, and that's tangible. Tucker is an opinion about the evidence, but he is not the evidence itself. I also have the analysis done by @we_have_risen, but that's harder for a non-IT person to understand, so I generally don't post it to servers like these
Where is this forensic analysis? Seems like something that would be screamed from the rooftops.
@Zuluzeit look at the NY times data, the votes counted is revised downwards several times by thousands of votes
@Autumn_Katrina, you just advanced to level 4!
What news reported for votes has no bearing on results.
this is the feed from the count
@Zuluzeit hence the video I just posted from MidnightTreeBandit where he breaks down the JSON file download from the Edison server.
Somtimes I feel like links are posted and no one actually clicks and watches.
> @Zuluzeit people have been screeming from the roof-tops, and all the media platforms ahve beemn silencing it. Hence the conversation I had with @busillis previously.
@Autumn_Katrina Sweet. Post it and run the risk of people not understanding it. Why would you want to suppress it?
You get that alleged vote switching doesnt report to election day results right? 🤔
@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 25!
I get that negative votes were applied to Trump (how can existing votes be unvoted)
I get that I have records of the data trail showing where Voting servers were accessed from, data paths used, and which keys were blocked from transfering between poling places and central facilities
I get that @we_have_risen posted the data-link diagrams publically, and that UI downloaded them within 2 hours in the event twitter deleted the thread or blocked the account
I get there is secuity cam footage showing ballot being brought out and counted by GA officials after poll watchers were told to leave for the evening
I get a whole lot more than I care to type
What do you get?
The link I gave you was just one of the more easily pre-digested for laymen videos I have, and that it was already posted by someone else, because I don't want to open my private server yet....that doesn't mean its the only evidence I have...it's just something to use as an example for @SassyCate of what Tangible (an analysis in which facts support a conclusion) vs. not tangible (Tucker Carlson's opinion) is
I get that the Republicans are going to lose the Senate due to infighting about GA presidential votes which have been counted 3 times, twice by machine, once by hand
How do you figure all of that got by everyone? All of them are in on it, except hyperpatriotic 3rd parties without direct access?