It seems to me that the most significant issues here, IMO, were barely skimmed over if not completely disregarded, resulted in eliminating any perceived transparency and fairness in the election results. These issues, being the “chain of custody” and the rules [of having Dem. and GOP pole workers/watchers sharing in the process], are absolutely vital and must be strictly enforced in each and every election going forward. I honestly believe that if this election had been properly supervised, followed the lawful procedures, and pole watchers had been allowed to actually observe and given a real voice in the challenge process, that the outcome could have been much less contentious. By properly following the procedures, any reported problems that might arise could be easily verified and proven by examining the logs and signatures in the chain of custody, putting the controversy to rest. And as long as there is accountability and strict adherence on chain of custody in the voter registration office in verifying the signature and residential address of the voters, the process should be considered fair and legitimate to all. If this election had been operated honestly and correctly, there would have been no reason what so ever for election officials not to simply verify any concerns or challenge to the vote counting as they occurred. We will experience the same if not a more serious situation in a few weeks if the election laws and procedures are not completely understood and precisely complied with, under penalty of law with serious consequences.

no???😥

brevity is not my strong point, But I said all i need to say...

It seems to me that the most significant issues here, IMO, were barely skimmed over if not completely disregarded, resulted in eliminating any perceived transparency and fairness in the election results. These issues, being the “chain of custody” and the rules [of having Dem. and GOP pole workers/watchers sharing in the process], are absolutely vital and must be strictly enforced in each and every election going forward. I honestly believe that if this election had been properly supervised, followed the lawful procedures, and pole watchers had been allowed to actually observe and given a real voice in the challenge process, that the outcome could have been much less contentious. By properly following the procedures, any reported problems that might arise could be easily verified and proven by examining the logs and signatures in the chain of custody, putting the controversy to rest. And as long as there is accountability and strict adherence on chain of custody in the voter registration office in verifying the signature and residential address of the voters, the process should be considered fair and legitimate to all. If this election had been operated honestly and correctly, there would have been no reason what so ever for election officials not to simply verify any concerns or challenge to the vote counting as they occurred. We will experience the same if not a more serious situation in a few weeks if the election laws and procedures are not completely understood and precisely complied with, under penalty of law with serious consequences.

From the data I found, the number of total votes cast in the election increased by 26,664,915 from 2016 [Trump v Clinton] Like 21% increase. That is a LOT of new votes

~65% of eligable voters

I'm talking about the whole population (50 states) Not just the states with alledged fraud.

wow!

CCP Dont play!

It seems they have bought the Dems, Fake news, Big tech, and a few in the GOP Im afraid...

Watch Tucker Carlson from last few nights

https://youtu.be/vZMOSlVXW4I https://youtu.be/nWRIiaXynKE https://youtu.be/veucMIIEVFs NOT election evidence for SCOTUS, but VERY Scary shit and completely relevant