Message from @meglide
Discord ID: 786472026310967326
@Autumn_Katrina perhaps it is Powell and Wood who are paid by the Democrats to tell the Republicans to boycott the run-off elections?
@meglide that article is slightly misleading, they are arguing not to vote unless the process is changed i.e. dont use the machines
Not sure all people took it that way, buddy.
Lol
If that's what they meant, it sure wasn't clear. I listened live.
@meglide Oh, I'm sure a politically motivate news paper which profits from headlines would claim that's what happening. None of the people I've spoken to are panicing, they don't even seem to be much concerned. Probably because they know you can't effectively boycott an election. The right is not exactly well known for havign standing xanax perscriptions. So, I find it highly unlikely they are secretly panicing without showing a sign of it.
if they vote they will have to use the machines or I guess they won't vote ... funny how the hand count (that's a bunch of humans in GA) got the same numbers as those machines
well sidney was pretty clear, i tend to agree that lin wasn't. but he restated it on twiter
Can't boycott an election? It's not hard.
@meglide there is still some concern about the machines and how they might not allow for a reliable audit because of the loss of voter information tied to each ballot.
Just don't vote. Some people already do that.
paper copy for every ballot cast
audit the paper and you have audited the machines
@meglide the paper doesnt say who voted, only that somebody did because it is a secret ballot.
Let's make it easy and round. 10 voting locations have 2000 voters come in and sign their rolls and cast a vote and it goes 50/50. Everything goes perfect and dominion machines record 1000 votes each candidate and a paper copy is printed out and locked up. Vote tallies are sent to the clerk for auditing and local county board for certification as well as to county officials to put on their website. That then gets sent to Edison research in a database which then gets sent out to CNN or other election night reporting.
The kraken said that software as voters scanned in their results logged Trump votes as Biden votes and those wrong results got passed through the process. This while plausible was disproven by the physical paper.
You are suggesting after that whole process went through they went back and switched votes and then explained to everyone along the way and all the checks in place to avoid fraud. How does that happen? That would be the most convoluted and easily detected impossible method to defraud a vote count.
yeah okay and your point is? thought the machines were flipping votes internally?
time-machine
@meglide What I honestly suspect, as it fits well with my psyops hypothesis I shared with @busillis (scroll up to my first posts, it's fairly complicated and I don't wish to retype it) is that Powell and Linwood are not working so much to get Trump elected (hence there mutual choice to leave the Gulianni and Ellis team) but as part of the larger operation to expose fraud in both parties (which pre-dated Trump's entry into politics, and goes all the way back to 9/11), and that when al is said and done, there will be a number of GOP politicians on thier chopping block as well.
@meglide i am not claiming the method they used. but at the same time you cannot say the process is infallible. in fact there are a number of documented flaws which led for example texas not to use them
For contrast the Detroit board flipped out and tried to decertify the election because precincts had reported 5678 votes and 5679 voters were listed. But somehow 10k votes get swapped from Trump to Biden and nobody is the wiser except people watching their TV screen getting 5th hand vote tallies? 🤔😂
@Dedkraken You're leaving otu the part where, not all states used versions fo the Dominion System taht produced a paper trail (as did GA), and those which did had the tamper seals broken for which the justification given was "paper jam".
@Dedkraken i wasnt aware that they have audited the machines, i.e. they only recounted a small sample rather than the whole state
@Dedkraken or maybe you just never knew that part in the first place because ... as I've told you....you need to do research
Then explain how it happened with any kind of voting machine. They are all equally ridiculous.
not infallible but probably good enough ... so far the paper checks out with the machine ... other allegations have been investigated and found to be wanting ... only options are 1) vote in run-off with system as is or 2) boycott election as recommended (at one point) by Lin Wood ... #2) makes no sense but that sure is what all this fuss over GA is promoting
Many states have random audits local and/or state level. GA was a full recount triggered by a close election which ruled out most fraud.
want to know why something is occurring, follow the money "According to the most recent FEC report, Trump has spent $8.8 million on legal efforts to overturn the election but has used that effort to raise more than $200 million, sending hundreds of email pitches to donors begging them to contribute to his quest to save the election from being stolen by dastardly Democrats." https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/08/whos-going-tell-gop-base-that-theyre-being-scammed/
https://youtu.be/vZMOSlVXW4I https://youtu.be/nWRIiaXynKE https://youtu.be/veucMIIEVFs NOT election evidence for SCOTUS, but VERY Scary shit and completely relevant
Theres different types of audits though. Randomly selected recounts are one thing. If a polling location reports 1000 Biden 1000 Trump to a clerk then they go back and say scratch out 500 Trump and add 500 Biden that's a bit of a red flag and they have to go find out why. This is why actual alleged fraud happens earlier in the process than it showing up on CNN. This is farcical.
@meglide suppose i scanned the same ballot in 10 times, would that show up in their audit?
If the number of scanned ballots is very different from the number of ballots it shows up pre audit or recount.
you can still add paper. at least some witnesses were testifying to this.
Every precinct has a tally and identity of every voter that voted there. These are added up to see how many votes should be in a city or county. If you rescan them a bunch theres too many votes. If you add a bunch of paper theres too many votes. The clerks check past attendance and partisan skew for possible errors. The checks in place are more in depth than you are imagining.
yes ... from the article: "At each table, workers broke open taped-up boxes and removed fat stacks of ballots sealed in clear plastic bags. At Team 12’s table, a man held a sheaf of ballots, declared the name of the candidate on each one, and handed it to a woman standing across the table who double-checked him, then placed the ballot in a bin with the candidate’s name."
maybe, but there are few examples of government projects that are run well
That's why Mellissa got nailed in the Michigan interview and humiliated Guiliani it was obvious neither ballots were added nor rescanned but she insisted something was off.
which one was mellissa?
Dominion supposed whistleblower and star witness turned snl sketch