Message from @Repeat
Discord ID: 786492933679087627
WOW
In fact, I recall some of the witnesses were challengers saying they were intimidated to the point where they were not able to perform their duties (for fear of being removed if they challenged too many votes).
WOW
The affidavits that weren't in the hearing were super frivolous. If what you are saying is true provides no relevant information or wrong ballots or crimes it shouldn't have been in the "hundreds of affidavits" but they were. They were full of incredibly odd and inane things that is why when a judge got them and the Trump legal team put forth zero effort to weed out credible cases they went in the trash.
Of the more substantial claims a handful were star witnesses like the train wrecks that were in MI which have a great deal of trouble squaring their in depth claims with things that happened. The expert affidavits such as in the kraken weave an incredible tale with suspect data but lack the expertise to be experts. Then you have a wide variety of poll watcher Karen's that claim rudeness but seem to be instead quit biased and whose stories dont mesh with independent nonpartisan folks there. If GOP poll watchers are violating the rules it's not a problem if they are dealt with. Their job is not to challenge 100% of votes or intimidate or attack election workers or scream or demand legal votes be thrown out of attack the building because they cant get in.
Ya can't tell me this isn't at least suspicious?
Yeah Lin Woods a lunatic. Martial law is bad.
> Their job is not...
No, but that is not at all what happened in every one of those cases, either.
> Yeah Lin Woods a lunatic. Martial law is bad.
I'm not so sure it wouldn't be worse than _this_.
This gaslighting and censorship is turning to anger and fury in a lot of Americans.
"Most secure elections in history"
Raffensberger should absolutely lawyer up. He did his job and investigated fraud. Lindsay Graham literally got caught telling him to rig the election for Trump discarding legal votes. Trump supporters are threatening him and his staff and his wife and children with death and rape and harassing them with Trump trains outside his home. He has no reason to cooperate with this sham. If they are not sending him a subpoena it would be real dumb to risk jail time getting caught up in this. The state Congress doesnt have the authority without a special session anyways
As a rule of thumb if your only path to winning is cheating or threatening the family of people doing the election it's not because you were actually the winner.
@Dedkraken I don't think you actually watched the hearings my guy, you conveniently have crafted a narrative as to why the affiants cannot be taken seriously, claiming most were "Frivolous" without anything substantial to back that up. If you cared to watch the Michigan hearing in full you would see the amount of people who came forward there ALONE and almost all of them corroborated the fact that poll watchers were intimidated, harassed, and obstructed from meaningfully doing their jobs, not to mention the testimony outlining lack of chain of custody of ballots, counting of ballots in machines multiple times (There is a video that came out today that shows this is indeed possible) and much more. Not to mention how you downplayed the expert witnesses without providing an in depth reason or counter argument as to why their testimony should not be considered.
Raffensberger is a good man. Integrity & principles.
I watched the hearings. I added context from court cases where they actually have to prove their claims instead of just saying anything they want without consequence or questions.
Raffensberger is the last human being on this planet that you should even remotely attribute any type of moral integrity to.
Why because he cares about democracy?
Court cases where also trumps lawyers claims mysteriously change when they could get disbarred or jailed or lying.
... Trump may have created his own dis-info campaign. Y'all have spent an entire month debunking nonsense lawsuits. Now you're fatigued. Then he drops the most serious law suit of them all with Texas.
The mass frivolous lawsuits are now a reason to dunk other lawsuits 😂 great plan?
And the best part is, that whole "You can't submit evidence to a case that went to SCOTUS" is BS because original jurisdiction, lmao.
@jfindley, you just advanced to level 12!
Great way to get the Presidency of the United States. In court by overturning the electorate.
If only it were the electorate
@Starscraper, you just advanced to level 3!
I'm pretty sure the voter fraud in this instance was pretty substantial. I mean, I've seen all the same evidence you have, probably, but I've also seen a lot of other stuff you might not have. I know it's fun to pick on Melissa and everything, but there's some legitimate "wtf was that?" that came up in almost every state.
Wtf moments happen every election. This one is no different. I’ve seen all the evidence taken to the courts and thrown out.
@AdamS, you just advanced to level 17!
I'm not sure "overturning" is the right word for it... More like a vote of no confidence.
> Court cases where also trumps lawyers claims mysteriously change when they could get disbarred or jailed or lying.
Don't knowingly spread this lie. That was a quote from a case that wasn't about fraud, so of course they didn't allege it in that one.
Right. As long as I've been alive, people have been crying about rigged elections. This is a chance for us to get away from that.
That’s usually what happens in 3rd world countries where the one in power is not happy with the result: turkey, Nigeria, Pakistan.
Do you think that Dominion provides a solid product?
Lol, they never claim rigged elections
This election was clearly suspect, and the fact they want to tell you "Nothing to see here" and refuse to do an audit/signature match to solidify and guarantee Biden's victory tells me otherwise. Too much stuff that i've seen tells me this was NOT legit
They [dictatorships] rig the elections then censor anyone from questioning them
Not a lie or a quote. Frequently their claims in courts did not remotely resemble claims on TV.