Not having actionable Damages is not Procedure.

i think smaller government is a good thing. the less the supreme court intervenes and lets states manage their own affairs, the less government micromanaging we have. i think states should have the power to do things in the best interests of their people. if my state govt isn’t taking care of me, i should elect better representatives so my will is represented.

That is commentary on standing.

@Whithers why does the south fly the battle flag of the confederates who were all southern Democrats?

If DJT brought the lawsuit in his personal capacity, he would have standing and be rightly a target of these damages

@AOH_Assassin and then case was thrown out on its merits as the remedy was ridiculous ask

Garbage cases submitted by whack jobs and criminals. The appeal is making more sense now.

Nope. No commentary on the merits.

https://youtu.be/YL-H-zAMCFE

@vfc alcutta, you just advanced to level 6!

@x96petersen1 No. Size of government is irrelevant. Government must be sufficient to govern. The small big argument is bull. States controlled by foreign powers and interests should not be left to their own devices and cannot act in the best interests of any American.

they didnt even look at the merits of the case from what i read

They looked. Didn't comment on them.

Not offering instantaneous relief does not mean no merits. The court simply didn’t want to get involved.

idk if that accurate but thats what was reported

He would not have Original Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court.

The Kraken... Can we finally put that to bed? For Spyder to end up being a former Army mechanic that was not able to complete entry level Intelligence training is just stunning. It's basically this:

I am not saying he start with SCOTUS...

@Zuluzeit is a reputed gas lighter and long time friend of cornpop, so @Zuluzet#7399 is a bad dude by extension.

Agreed.

Pot... Kettle... Black much?

@james j There are two reasons the Battle Standard of the Army of Northern Virginia are flown: 1) by those that still hold to the Democratic Party values of a socialist ethnostate, and 2) by those that see it as opposition to the ruling power, no matter who that power is.

@AOH_Assassin this is 1984 bad is good

...

@Zuluzeit been gas lighting since well before this crew knew what it meant.

Supreme Court in 1983 (Anderson v. Celebrezze):

“Furthermore, in the context of a Presidential election, state-imposed restrictions implicate a uniquely important national interest. For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. Moreover, the impact of the votes cast in each State is affected by the votes cast for the various candidates in other States.”

Gas lighting is bio gas lighting

Fair

@Whithers by southern democrats fighting for their southern values which at the time was conservative

The court has voted that people water the Tree of Liberty.

Yep

You know how people say Europe’s conservatives are like American liberal?

You started back in the Days of Oil Lamps?

Same concept @Whithers

https://www.google.com/amp/s/headlines360.news/2020/11/29/gen-mcinerney-reports-us-special-forces-attacked-cia-server-farm-in-germany/amp/

@james j No. They were not conservative. Moral relativity does not exist.

seriously enuf, nobody buys the revisionist history crap outside of a leftist college

Got a video to watch. Bbl. Stay special.

Old school blue flamer?

@Ghostdog 👍

The 1619 Project and everything related to it is and will always be a lie.