after you read the federalist's papers read the amendments

the chiefs are just political and dont do much, they pass down orders POTUS gives

then, just for fun. Read the 131 page Patriot act that took more than you know away

@Whithers I am not wiser now. I am still wondering why anyone would find that Biden or Trump is a person worth voting for. I understand against, just not for.

@AOH_Assassin It can improve if we cut it off from Chinese and Leftist access.

Then, read teh Affordable Care act, 336 pages.

Then, come speak to me

Til then you are literally ignorant

You literally just used it for the guy you said was a constitutional lawyer even though if you read his education he is a international lawyer @AOH_Assassin

You are denying the 2019 October date? @AOH_Assassin

There is no political controversy about his qualifications.

@Tneedels the logic bombs are devastating lol

There is , you can’t just proclaim yourself a constitutional lawyer

@Doc That is because you have never understood what it is to be a principled American. Here is a good place to start: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c&t=14s

The cases that have been heard on merit have not stood up to scrutiny. Look at the NV case. They had witnesses and experts give testimony under oath with cross examination. They did not hold up at all. It was not even close. I highly recommend that anyone who thinks the cases are simply being dismissed to watch that case and read the filings/rulings. It is eye-opening. The RWM is lying to you that the merit of these cases are not being considered.

He didn’t write that section on Wikipedia

simply because he is not a politician. He can't be bought. Finally, he hasn't accepted a single penny for his job as POTUS. . . First time in history refused payment. Not only that, he lost money by the millions if not billions

@AOH_Assassin how about this

This is why they lost in lasches

They had a year to bring up this issue

Nothing has been heard on merit, except in a local court in Pennsylvania

That they started and didn’t finish

@AOH_Assassin https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroom/governor-wolf-signs-election-reform-bill-including-new-mail-in-voting/

first president from outside of politics and a billionaire that cant be bought and paid for, thats who i voted for over the 50yr corrupt flip flopping politician that had open brain surgery

That judge ruled in favor, and accepted the on the basis that it would "likely win"

@james j They lost under a provision that does not apply to persons that are enemies of the nation.

@AOH_Assassin do you accept the official pa site?

then the pennsylvania supreme court stepped in, took it from her, and dismissed because of latches

Act 77 was a statute. It was never an amendment.

@james j It is an illegal and unconstitutional law.

https://peoplepill.com/people/michael-farris/

They lost under the bill of which they filed, making it a technical not marital

Act 77 doesn't have shit on

The Pennsylvania Constitution

Check out the Nevada case, if you are so sure.

And not even close to the Amendments

The party’s affiliation with regard to the law passed does not invalidate arguments about constitutionality

And if you truly believe that an act passed a year ago touches teh Constitution, you're worse than i thought

@Whithers no it’s a law the PA gop started and never finished. That’s why it’s unconstitutional under state law. However the remedy the asked for was ridiculous. And they lost to laches. Because they had a year to address it and had a election under the GOP rules

Is there a list of the cases somewhere along with some analysis of what occurred in the cases?

@Whithers Im not starting anything. Sorry. I am looking for a person to explain to me why they voted FOR someone, as opposed to voting for the lesser of two evils. I think we can conclude I still have not found such a person.