It's not... It's the duty of the legislature to determine the "manner" that will be used on election day. Every state's legislature chose a popular vote.

@AOH_Assassin it was a case that asked for a remedy for something the GOP did. You never responded to this

They never finished the process they started before the pandemic @AOH_Assassin

Not going to happen... The Joint Chiefs have already signaled that they will support Biden.

@Doc

would it be good for us American's for them to provide some insight? Yes, most definitely. Since the media wants to censor and black out as if they have that authority, when the news hits everybody that Trump is POTUS once again. All you that didnt watch anything on the other side are going to be caught off-guard. Then you're gonna try to burn down your neighbors house, and then. . . . well. let's see how it plays. but you should pay attention to both sides

It's not up to the joint chiefs

especially if they have committed federal crime

my lord

will any of you read your constitution?

or do you just scream echos?

@Whithers No idea what this means.

after you read teh constitution, read the federalist's papers.

Wikipedia is not a reliable , nor complete, source of information for political controversy. Doing away with signature verifications is illegal. Any significant provision to existing state law not implemented through a constitutional amendment is unconstitutional

after you read the federalist's papers read the amendments

the chiefs are just political and dont do much, they pass down orders POTUS gives

then, just for fun. Read the 131 page Patriot act that took more than you know away

@Whithers I am not wiser now. I am still wondering why anyone would find that Biden or Trump is a person worth voting for. I understand against, just not for.

@AOH_Assassin It can improve if we cut it off from Chinese and Leftist access.

Then, read teh Affordable Care act, 336 pages.

Then, come speak to me

Til then you are literally ignorant

You literally just used it for the guy you said was a constitutional lawyer even though if you read his education he is a international lawyer @AOH_Assassin

You are denying the 2019 October date? @AOH_Assassin

There is no political controversy about his qualifications.

@Tneedels the logic bombs are devastating lol

There is , you can’t just proclaim yourself a constitutional lawyer

@Doc That is because you have never understood what it is to be a principled American. Here is a good place to start: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c&t=14s

The cases that have been heard on merit have not stood up to scrutiny. Look at the NV case. They had witnesses and experts give testimony under oath with cross examination. They did not hold up at all. It was not even close. I highly recommend that anyone who thinks the cases are simply being dismissed to watch that case and read the filings/rulings. It is eye-opening. The RWM is lying to you that the merit of these cases are not being considered.

He didn’t write that section on Wikipedia

simply because he is not a politician. He can't be bought. Finally, he hasn't accepted a single penny for his job as POTUS. . . First time in history refused payment. Not only that, he lost money by the millions if not billions

@AOH_Assassin how about this

This is why they lost in lasches

They had a year to bring up this issue

Nothing has been heard on merit, except in a local court in Pennsylvania

That they started and didn’t finish

@AOH_Assassin https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroom/governor-wolf-signs-election-reform-bill-including-new-mail-in-voting/

first president from outside of politics and a billionaire that cant be bought and paid for, thats who i voted for over the 50yr corrupt flip flopping politician that had open brain surgery

That judge ruled in favor, and accepted the on the basis that it would "likely win"

@james j They lost under a provision that does not apply to persons that are enemies of the nation.

@AOH_Assassin do you accept the official pa site?