@Maw like everyone
Everyone is conservative.
Everyone is conservative relative to something @Maw
That feel when you continue to make words mean less.
No the further back in time you go the more conservative views become
Today’s liberal is tomorrows conservative
This is how It’s always been
Ok. I need to see some evidence here. The argument isn't supporting the premise nor conclusion.
Yes, I am aware of the overton window shift.
So yeah Obama today or 20 years from know would be conservative
You do realize that all progress is not always positive, right? We're talking about methods of progress.
Methods of progress are not always positive.
Stagnation is always negative
Take a chance on progress and correct as you go
A Slippery Slope argument is usually achieved by Emotional responses prior to any meaningful thought or reflection?
Pretty reckless.
The job of the conservative is to be a little bit of a stick in the mud
That is their utility
Like China testing gene manipulation on real live humans?
This is how things operate
"We just cut people open while they were alive for progress, it's a good thing." You realize methods of progress can be inherently bad, yes?
@Cali La La China had no moral ethics and poorer safety standards. They crispr cas 9 a pair of twins to be hiv resistant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0LVlXqCIg&ab_channel=TheFinanceHub
Then we never heard from the doctor again
@Maw we have ethical standards
We can’t do a lot of things
I think they're more talking about Unit 731.
I know
America then paid for the research
Yep.
Well, yes and no.
They basically gave people immunity for having the research.
But modern medical ethics no longer allow for such a thing, hence progress
That is inherently conservative, morals and ethical restrictions.
We develop better ways to do research
No that’s just a being humane issue
Being humane is a liberal virtue
The way you're defining conservativism being resistance to progress, yes, it means that limits imposed by morality and ethics is inherently conservative by your logic.
Naw.
You made the point that conservatives are ohms, and progress is electricity.
Don't change your definitions now.
