The district court in PA ruled on the merits and suspended certification and then the SC dismissed for laches without any comments on the merits

You can’t revoke votes because of a issue you caused and had a year to fix, and had a election already prior to the general election under those same conditions @The Mongler

@The Mongler they were correct to do so . Laches fits the case. I know people like Barnes will say different but he basically works for the Trump team and does everything he can to bolster that side

However he is incorrect in this and is intentionally mis leading

@The Mongler here is a better understanding of laches

“statute of limitations is concerned only with the time that has passed. Laches is concerned with the reasonableness of the delay in a particular situation and so is more case-specific and more focused on the equitable conduct of the plaintiff.”

Merry Christmas all... wishing you and your family all the best. Adam.

That flies in the Face of your Standing Argument. How can you file prior to actual suffered Damages?

This is about laches

"Ripeness "?

It wasn’t about the injury it was about a incomplete process

They kept repeating that it wasn’t about the fact they lost

Had a Year to Fix?

Had a year to address

Are people still not understanding this very basic thing

Trump was not in prior Elections or was there Electors.

This lawsuit was not about trump

It was not about fraud

It was about a legal technicality

You still need to show Damages.

This is not about the Texas case

That was even dumber than the internal PA case

The Texas case was about standing. Which they did not have

We'll have a Merry Christmas. I was just checking my messages. I have more important things to do. Enjoy!

Not true actually, damages don't need to exist in order to file a lawsuit.

See: Preventive injunction.

It seems to me the remedy effects laches but not the merit? Like PA might have merit and be unconstitutional but they are saying throw out millions of votes which also violates the Constitution. If they asked to have to fixed for next time or asked to have it fixed a year ago they'd be fine. But some the the cases they said do not have merit like trying to have state congress override the popular vote because they lost. Still laches but they'd lose the case if it went forward anyways.

Some have merits.

Anyone in here have cell service affected by the ATT transmission building damages in Tenn?

Some but can't confirm its related

I'm trying to figure out if this person was just riding on the back of the event for internet clout or if this video [now removed] was to be taken seriously.

Too many possibilities for that to have value now.

1* Many of her videos are simply not normal and promote extremist socialist and sexual based agendas.

2* Its possible she was making a fucked up joke

3* She has been doxxed and is removing social media to try and get away from all the bad attention.

Time will tell

By the way Art is owner of CNN, the group that spent years attacking our American President and attempted to kill Inc Sandmann. Never forget or forgive

AT&T not art

Where are you located?

By the way AT&T is owner of CNN, the group that spent years attacking our American President and attempted to kill Nick Sandmann. Never forget or forgive

California which is why it would make zero sense.

Somebody sent me this earlier. massive outages.

Also, the fact that the recording in the van was warning people to evacuate. Means that collateral damage wasn’t the objective. Looking at the other buildings in the immediate area, I can safely say that the ATT transmission building was the most likely target.

Yeah.

What about SunGaurd? Where are they located.