Message from @EZZ
Discord ID: 793893244927868948
yes, those are my words. I stand by them.
So how am I wrong
Pepe Silva fits
Not gossiping. Just mentioning what is on the video of the shredder the day the election was being certified.
Dots and everything
Enjoy your day.
Go with Christ.
A gossip hearing
Jesus Christ
Of course Jesus is involved
Faithless....
You can block them if need be
Don’t block factual information @Liberty or Death
Don’t get sucked Into a information bubble that just spreads gossip
"People seeing something they don't understand doesn't mean they get to make up what it was." ... you're taking all the fun out of life
> @Zuluzeit already bunk...
@busillis They did see shredding (of envelopes) which is supposed to happen. The witnesses felt that it wasn't appropriate protocol. This is the problem with mapping meaning onto processes about which one is ignorant. I guarantee they walked out of that room thinking shredded envelopes is fraud.
They should train people on how to know what they are seeing
Maybe for a month before an election
you mean like this: "In a release issued through Cobb County Government spokesman Ross Cavitt, Cobb Elections said the items that were being shredded were mailing labels, completed and “checked off” reports, sticky notes and other papers and documents.
Voters were mailed two envelopes as part of their absentee ballot package. One was a “white privacy envelope” that contained the actual absentee ballot. The privacy envelope was then placed in a larger mailing envelope that contained the voter’s signature.
The privacy envelopes were among the items that were also shredded—after the election was certified—but not the mailing envelopes with the signatures."
http://eastcobbnews.com/cobb-elections-explains-post-recount-shredding-activities/
@EZZ, you just advanced to level 6!
Psy ops
No
> They should train people on how to know what they are seeing
@james j Or how to not draw concrete conclusions about things about which they know nothing. We will now have a portion of people who didn't even see what was misunderstood believing it was yet another example of fraud. Conclusion about a misconception by proxy.
People have been primed for months to think there will be fraud for months because of trump. So now when they see something that they don’t understand they just assume fraud @duckherder
Elections used to be transparent and simple. Prefer going back to that instead of psy ops
Basic critical thinking taught in school
Early
doesn't help that there was litigation all summer to relax signature matching standards and keep voter rolls dirty
People are just supposed to trust that
Less subjective signature matching @duckherder
"The audit team, consisting of law enforcement officers with the Secretary of State’s office and
GBI, reviewed 15,118 ABM ballot oath envelopes from randomly selected boxes that stored the
150,431 ABM ballots received in Cobb County for the November 3, 2020 General Election. The
sample size of oath envelopes reviewed was chosen in order to reach a 99% confidence level in
the results. Utilizing the decision guidelines set forth below, the audit team confirmed the
accuracy of the initial determination of the Cobb County Elections Department in all but two
cases. In the two cases where the audit team determined that the voter should have received a
cure notification, the audit team was able to confirm by interviews with the voters that the
actual voters in question cast the ballots. Based on the results of the audit, the Cobb County
Elections Department had a 99.99% accuracy rate in performing correct signature verification
procedures. The audit team was also able to confirm that the two ballots that should have
initially been identified by Cobb County Elections Department staff as requiring a cure
notification were actually cast by the voters to whom they were issued. No fraudulent absentee
ballots were identified during the audit."
https://sos.ga.gov/admin/uploads/Cobb%20County%20ABM%20Audit%20Report%2020201229.pdf
Forcing three judges to agree on a mismatch is basically tantamount to not doing signature matching at all. All it does is increase the possibility of a fraudulent ballot being counted.
No it means the signatures actually have to be off. @duckherder no one guy can subjectively decide they don’t like the signature
It lessens the ability of partisanship at the signature verification process @duckherder
We've been over this several times already and I'm going to probably just head out. whether it would have changed the outcome of the election or not as a completely different issue. I'm saying that this election was dysfunctional especially in Georgia and Pennsylvania. if you guys like what you see there you may want to move to a third world country cuz it's basically what it is.
@duckherder, you just advanced to level 4!
@duckherder read what megline posted