Message from @Philip R
Discord ID: 794421643437932574
Chris suck'em-up is not a conservative reporter.
You realize this is directly against being an ancap yes?
You're actually on the way to ancom if you're into social liberalism.
That made me laugh, thank you
Likewise.
Hahaha
I don't know who that was directed to, but by looking at evidence. And if you're referring to the Harvard link I posted, that didn't say that it was centre-left.
Every site rating Fox as Rightwing is Leftist.
> Every site rating Fox as Rightwing is Leftist.
@Whithers Comedy gold.
Fox is part of the right wing echo chamber... To argue otherwise is lunacy.
Newsguard, Media-Bias, Media Matters, etc. - all Leftist.
I haven't watched Fox that much, and my watching of it would not be random samples. I was going on evidence I have seen. I've also heard the left claim here in Oz that the News Ltd-owned Sky New is right wing, and yet it employs both progressives and conservatives, unlike the rest of the media that tends to only employ progressives.
Therefore everything is left.
Sky News is very Fox-like, yes.
You just think fox is right wing because you're on the marxist fringe of the left
ok
lol
There are two major echo chambers that exist to keep America divided. Trying to assert a news media organization is more or less right or left wing is pointless - they each fall into one chamber or the other. There are extremist on both sides. We are experiencing proof of that tonight.
Lmfao Marxist!
Okay, so what's the distinction between "objectively true" and "factually true"?
As for the scientific method, that is a *method*, not a dogma.
Correct. The Left holds that anything that is not Marxist is Rightwing/Far Right. And Fox, which is centrist, has employees from all sides that are free to express their positions. The other media outlets fire people if they are conservative and keep those they don't know about silenced.
I mean sure fox doesn't think the LTV is a thing so to you they probably seem far right
No, Fox is centrist and NTD, Newsmax, OANN, and some others are conservative.
A number of former lefties have testified that they lived in a leftist bubble where they were actually unaware of another viewpoint, or at least the rationale for it.
The extremists want to assert their supremacy of being so much more enlightened than everyone else.
Disagree.
And yet I showed you a study that showed that it wasn't.
> Okay, so what's the distinction between "objectively true" and "factually true"?
> As for the scientific method, that is a *method*, not a dogma.
@Philip R You'll get used to the smuggled-in intended pejoratives.
With flawed methodology, as I've pointed out numerous times.
Also you've never even really watched fox news.
Because you say so?
Fox doesn't think owning a business should be punishable by death - they're far right
wat
Pretty sure the claim was right wing.
Stop straw manning.
Profit is not a synonym for theft - far right status confirmed
Scientific method is a method only where it is in practice by those that are scientists by profession instead of scientific as a secular theology. Scientific method is a practice by professional scientists and a religious right by religious scientists.
What is factually true is something about reality observed and recorded by multiple witnesses as a reliable and reoccurring event. Objectivity does not exist because no one can observe from outside of their self. No thought can take place which is not subject to the self. Objectivity cannot exist.
Keep up the ridiculous strawmans I guess.