Message from @Dedkraken

Discord ID: 794636395976065044


2021-01-01 18:30:02 UTC  

This would show up on hand count.

2021-01-01 18:30:16 UTC  

The states not the dhs in a secret conspiracy using special paper to prove fraud

2021-01-01 18:31:28 UTC  

lol pretty sure it's companies like Runbeck that print them, not the DHS

2021-01-01 18:33:14 UTC  

Which btw, they do have watermarks and qr codes. Which is where that conspiracy likely comes from. That's why people want an audit of the ballots, the paper, the ink.

2021-01-01 18:33:36 UTC  

the hand count in which state

2021-01-01 18:33:48 UTC  

The one where the count was different 5 times

2021-01-01 18:34:09 UTC  

Allegedly

2021-01-01 18:34:30 UTC  

Allegedly = Conspiracy

2021-01-01 18:35:11 UTC  

coffee county

2021-01-01 18:35:11 UTC  

It’s not a conspiracy just a Trump elector disagreeing with what happened 😆

2021-01-01 18:36:21 UTC  

I'm sure anyone that questions the election results is a Trump worshiper lol

2021-01-01 18:36:50 UTC  

What?

2021-01-01 18:38:38 UTC  

It’s a bit odd claim to make

2021-01-01 18:39:03 UTC  

What indeed.

2021-01-01 18:39:21 UTC  

Literally no one implied anyone who doesn't accept the results is a Trump supporter.

2021-01-01 18:39:40 UTC  

This sounds like some random strawman.

2021-01-01 18:40:42 UTC  

Trump "insert noun of your choice"

2021-01-01 18:40:51 UTC  

Trump Buck?

2021-01-01 18:40:58 UTC  

Trump Orange?

2021-01-01 18:41:00 UTC  

Trump Car

2021-01-01 18:41:20 UTC  

So the machine counted the ballots 5 times and got different results but nobody else saw it and then the hand recount matched and then the 2nd recount matched?

2021-01-01 18:41:29 UTC  

My point still stands, it's kinda a random strawman.

2021-01-01 18:41:36 UTC  

It's not a conspiracy, it's a Trump "noun"....

2021-01-01 18:41:40 UTC  

That’s pretty lucky

2021-01-01 18:42:54 UTC  

Whoa. Nobody else saw it? Fascinating. How do we confirm the seeing of things?

2021-01-01 18:43:13 UTC  

How did they know which of the 5 results was the actual vote count

2021-01-01 18:43:50 UTC  

You're asking the wrong questions.

2021-01-01 18:44:19 UTC  

What are the right questions? How does seeing work isn’t doing it for me

2021-01-01 18:44:49 UTC  

Same, which is why i disagree with your logic on Judges reviewing the evidence.

2021-01-01 18:44:54 UTC  

Does this make sense now?

2021-01-01 18:45:11 UTC  

Sure, some judges didn't look at the lawsuits.

2021-01-01 18:45:26 UTC  

But they still generally had valid flaws.

2021-01-01 18:45:34 UTC  

Fix the flaws if possible and try again.

2021-01-01 18:45:48 UTC  

(assuming you aren't dismissed with prejudice.)

2021-01-01 18:46:23 UTC  

Hey, now were getting somewhere at least. So which judges didn't look at the evidence and how do we determine that?

2021-01-01 18:46:26 UTC  

Laches is kinda ehh.

2021-01-01 18:46:51 UTC  

Typically cases that get thrown out prior to meritorious arguments.

2021-01-01 18:47:30 UTC  

I think Texas's case was tossed out appropriately.

2021-01-01 18:47:43 UTC  

As for the powell lawsuits, eh.

2021-01-01 18:48:14 UTC  

The lawsuits contained evidence they wanted to present. The judges looked at the lawsuits.

2021-01-01 18:49:03 UTC  

Laches wasn’t about fraud