Message from @Azizah
Discord ID: 794794941317906453
who cheated?
It’s like an Xbox live lobby in here!
If you have been reading anything I have stated....my concern is all of the doors left open for cheating
and the refusal to close them
One more time.... you are assuming those 4,000 people did actually move out of State. One side says they did and one side says maybe not.
So, allowing them to vote on provisional ballots (if they show up to vote) IS the right thing to do.
The SCOTUS has long since ruled that courts should always err on the side of allowing votes instead of suppressing them.
So... I absolutely agree that the judge ruled correctly. I just think she should have allowed another judge hear the case given the nature of it.
ther are checks and balances in place. whose refusing? the only one who has blocked electoral reform is Mitch McConnel. and i won't lie, i haven't read all that you have posted.
@mg216, you just advanced to level 5!
Also... @Azizah there is tons of case law suggesting that voter roll purges should never take place on the eve of an election (and by eve I dont mean the night before but a few months before)
some states have people that have been dead over 20 years on the voter logs but according to your previous statements each state can do what they choose......legally you are correct but should we really allow states to be negligent in updating voter logs?
and then use that negligence to possibly impact an election and they throw up their hands and say oooops
somebody please kill me.
LOL... ok wow... why are you even arguing this? FEDERAL law prohibits the cleaning of voter rolls 90 days before any federal election.
The judge didn't matter... its a fucking violation of federal law
https://www.justice.gov/crt/national-voter-registration-act-1993-nvra
The removing of those names less than 90 days before the Senate Runoff is fucking illegal
its like fucking clear as day
It also prohibits people from voting twice but that doesn't matter either....did you see that Texas is actually passing a law that makes it illegal to vote if you are dead now....because if you don't have that as a law its technically not illegal
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
@SoonMrWick elaborate
@Azizah this is where the legal concept of "moot" means
Its completely fucking moot that Abrams sister made the ruling because the law is fucking crystal clear. YOU CAN NOT CLEAN OR PURGE VOTER ROLLS 90 DAYS BEFORE A FEDERAL ELECTION.
We are within 90 days of the Senate Runoff.... so the attempted removal of those names violates The National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
Your concern is moot, tired and at this point ridiculous
WW2 propaganda was the greatest meme warfare in the history of the world.
wow it seems that civil conversation is no longer appropriate for you....it appears we are done
Ah smart move for the government
Its a part of the voice chat because I'm at a location I can't talk. So I'm just adding tidbits if they are seen.
Ohhh
Ima slide in
I have been very respectful and stating points in a civil manner....you do not have to agree with them but there is no need for that type of response
Make drugs not war!
Thank goodness.... you assume that the people moved... you bitch and moan about this or that and don't even pay attention to the fact that she did what the law required her to do...
So of course she should have recused herself... but its moot because had you bothered to look at the Judges actual ruling you would have been linked to the National Voters Registration Act which prohibits ANY cleaning or purging of voter rolls 90 before a Federal Election.
Im sorry but this is as clear cut an issue as it gets. The Election Board attempted to violate Federal Law and your bitch is about which Judge ruled instead of how that judge ruled.
That is beyond petty. Her ruling was OBVIOUSLY correct.
Pennsylvania violated their own laws, but that was okay for you because it worked in your favor....you actually listed other states that broke the law to defend Pennsylvania breaking their laws.
We are talking about GA now.... stop deflecting.
I honestly a bit shocked that you went through all that protestation about those 4,000 votes when its blindingly obvious that any judge would have ruled the same way.
Its not even a close call.... They simply cannot remove people from voter rolls this close to a federal election and for good reason.
Pennsylvania actually waived federal requirements without approval of their senators lol
What federal requirement?
ID
LOL you need to go read that ID law... it was signed by GW Bush and no they didnt waive or violate it