is the existence template already here? not seeing it

ok thank you

I'm seeing the powerpoint for the existence system but not seeing an editable form....any guidance would be appreciated

I'm really wanting to sit down and work on this a bit tonight. Me and my daughter

I can download the presentation but the documents in the presentation are just images so there is no way to edit them

Unless I'm missing something that means I would have to re-type and format everything in a new document

I absolutely loved the presentation and Robert was showing how you can just click and edit each line. Is that format available?

Perfect....Thank You!!!

I am really looking forward to trying this!

Robert posted a template in the existence-systems folder that worked great. I was able to just save it to enable editing 🙂

Thank you so much. I will provide feedback on how it works for us. I'm super excited to try it. There are so many things that I always feel I need to do and a lot of the things Robert said today really got me thinking.

will do

This is not about the results of any one election. This is about the rulings made by judges when an election is formally contested. American citizens were told outright that no investigations are allowed. This should terrify us all. These rulings set precedents. Just because your candidate may have come out on top this time, they may not next time. Unfortunately, courts have already ruled in 2020 that elections are non-contestable. They will not even be heard by the court regardless of evidence. Scary time for the American system of government.

Both major political parties have questioned the integrity of our elections for years with the exact same concerns. But It's a bit like a football instant replay, the team that scored or got away with something wants to just let it go and the other side wants to take a quick look to confirm. It's better to take a look than ignore the evidence readily available that can completely change the outcome of the game. This problem is not going to go away unless we have some instant replay rules applied to elections.

take a minute and google election fraud 2016 and take a look at the laundry list of things democrats said was unfair

I'm just saying both sides have questioned election integrity for years so maybe we should make some changes to restore faith in our process.

I just want an honest investigation into what occurred instead of the excuses not to look. Asking the people responsible for overseeing elections to investigate them will only call out their possible failures.

It's more about the way they report it. CNN reports things in a way that says ooooh look another case thrown out, so everything must have been legit in the election. You will never hear them say 'ooooh another case the courts refused to look at on the merits, so we still have no idea if everything was legit'

Just a quick excerpt.....they went beyond the truth and greatly ventured into opinion. Thus the issue with CNN and similar outlets.

"Gohmert's suit was part of the desperate and extraordinary GOP attempt to overturn the presidential election using baseless and unproven allegations of mass voter fraud and charging that multiple states that President-elect Joe Biden won illegally changed their voting rules due to the pandemic. Those arguments have failed dozens of times in state and federal courts over the past two months."

Absolutely not...I do not want to see the sitting VP get to determine the outcome of every election. But there were many other cases thrown out that should have been looked at. For example Texas vs Pennsylvania. How do the other 49 states in a union not have standing to challenge when one breaks laws that affect who governs all of the states?

Texas sued Pennsylvania for Pennsylvania violating their own state laws!

So who should have filed the case? they don't file themselves... and 17 other states stood up and said 'yeah this is a problem'

Because they refused to listen to it on merits....it's in black and white....they have written laws and they have what they actually did. They do not match

Texas said Pennsylvania broke their own laws very clearly and this impacts us. And 17 other states agreed.

YES

This is not about who won.....this is about making sure everyone has faith in elections

I care about the truth plain and simple

There was a major difference. The federal government has only a handful of overall rules one being that you need proof of identification to vote. The states that broke their own laws plus the very few federal guidelines should be investigated.

And that doesn't seem suspicious to you at all?

Trump got more votes than any sitting President in history. I don't know of a single person that was actually excited about the thought of Biden as a President. It was either voting party lines or hating Trump.

Why are election officials so terrified of inspection? If thousands of people signed affidavits saying they saw your spouse cheating on you and you asked where they were that night and they said 'none of your business' just trust me." Seems a bit suspicious huh?

maybe you should look up how much democrats spent to try and prove russian interference in 2016 and then we can discuss further. 🙂

they at least were granted a chance to look.....ya think maybe if republicans were allowed to look in 2020 we might find something too. Or are only democrats entitled to investigate?

Republicans are all just whiners that should accept whatever happens huh?

My entire point is Republicans should be just as entitled to investigate potential fraud as Democrats. It's really that simple.

Whether you like Trump or not is not the point. It is that Democrats are allowed to investigate fraud and Republicans are told they are crazy if they even suggest fraud. It's an unfair double standard.

Do you really believe that if enough people do not like a particular person they are no longer entitled to due process under the law?

Courts are dismissing cases without ever looking at the merit

NO. Those cases were dismissed on technicalities not merit...that is the problem.

Please take a minute to educate yourself on how many of those cases were dismissed on evidence, until then I am done. Due process is not achieved by throwing cases out without reviewing evidence. Latches, moot, and often standing were used to say, I don't want to deal with the real issues.

I would just like to see examples of cases being thrown out due to insufficient evidence.....they are all procedural and avoid reviewing evidence.

Many of the judges actually say they believe they case has merit as they deny for procedural reasons 😦

If you have been paying attention to my comments this is not about who wins or loses this election. It is that the precedents set by our courts in not allowing review of fraud destroys future election integrity. They gave both parties a license to cheat at will with no fear of getting caught. May the best cheaters win!

explain latches and moot then.....how is it moot to review election fraud 2 weeks after the election before electors are sent?

If everything was moot as soon as the media declared a president elect why did dems investigate russian collusion for years?

give me a link, I would like to see one that was actually filed but Trump or his lawyers that evidence was heard. Only one I know of was where they got to inspect voting machines and an independent company Allied did find fraud.

there was one in arizona where they had a very small scope...only looking at adjudicated ballots in 1 county I believe.

There is a reason I watch Robert for the legal stuff. I don't trust any media outlet to explain legal matters to my satisfaction

You are making a lot of assumptions about my media viewing. I have serious issues with all media outlets as data is always presented in a biased fashion. I am an engineer and like facts. And I care about the future of our country in terms of elections. 1 single Presidential term is minor in the scheme of our republic. I want both sides to have faith in elections whether they win or lose.

The only reason I mentioned CNN's reporting practices was in response to you saying they were only telling the truth about what happened in the case. When in fact they had about 1 line of truth and the rest opinion.

Well I'm glad we can agree on that.

I really just want to both sides to be able to trust our election system and based on 2016 and 2020 alone I think we can agree that the way things are now nobody really has much faith in it.

The winning side thinks it's amazing and the losing side thinks it's corrupt and then we switch opinions 4 years later. We just like when we win but we don't really trust it.

We are both entitled to our opinions but I have to respectfully disagree. As an engineer I can't help but look at the data and trends. The anomalies present right on the election results pages of the respective states is very disturbing. Human nature is to believe that others believe the same way we do and our limited circle of people validating that belief. None of our small sample sets are capable of determining real trends as most people surround themselves with like minded individuals (with a few outliers).

You say that as if it unique to Trump? https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-election-day/election-2016-tracking-reports-voting-problems-across-united-states-n673236

I specifically stated from the posted election results of the state being reviewed. After certification, that is easy enough to find without posting links.

We are talking about 1 topic at a time. In that particular case that is what I was referring to in terms of the data. Trying not to write entire novels here.

Courts gave Americans a free license to cheat plain and simple, regardless of whether it occurred it will not be investigated. May the best cheaters win from here on out. If your cheating game is not up to par the courts will not care. We will forever be a country divided if we can't remedy this before our next election.

Peace out!

They had a list of over 4000 names of people ineligible to vote in Georgia that actually did vote. They were told that because the state didn't purge them from their own voter logs within 90 days of the election that they will let 4000 votes that they know are fraudulent stand.

they used a technicality to count them

none of your business 🙂

wow you really think to have a valid argument you have to give your address? You first, go ahead and tell everyone where you live

because I'm sure you prefer left wing sources. Here is the left spun view source. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-blocks-attempted-voter-purge-in-two-georgia-counties-ahead-of-runoffs/

each of these people has filed for change of address before the run offs....they were trying to be proactive and take care of it before they votes are cast and latches is used to say they cant remove people who moved

lol look it up its a court case 🙂

The court agreed and 1 judge overturned it

the judge that overturned it was stacy abrams sister....bit of a conflict of interest there dont you think?

she was asked to recuse herself and refused

these are the reasons people are skeptical....this is shady as hell

Gardner declined to recuse herself, writing in her ruling that the court “finds no basis for recusal.”

they did ask for a recusal Gardner declined to recuse herself, writing in her ruling that the court “finds no basis for recusal.”

wow those are some serious blinders you have on there

she was bragging about how many new voters she was recruiting

and then her sister rules to leave 4000 on that moved out of the area

If you can't see the conflict of interest in the judge sister of a woman actively recruiting voters allowing over 4000 ineligible voters to vote anyway I'm not even sure what to say to you anymore

she never said they didn't move....she said they couldn't do a systematic purge within 90 days of an election.....again using a technicality to allow over 4000 votes from people that moved.

so for future elections it comes down to who casts the ballots for those 4000 people first? my point exactly....encouraging cheating

how much do you want to bet those 4000 people are still on the voter logs in 2 years?

If you have been reading anything I have stated....my concern is all of the doors left open for cheating

and the refusal to close them

some states have people that have been dead over 20 years on the voter logs but according to your previous statements each state can do what they choose......legally you are correct but should we really allow states to be negligent in updating voter logs?

and then use that negligence to possibly impact an election and they throw up their hands and say oooops

It also prohibits people from voting twice but that doesn't matter either....did you see that Texas is actually passing a law that makes it illegal to vote if you are dead now....because if you don't have that as a law its technically not illegal

that is how absurd things have become

wow it seems that civil conversation is no longer appropriate for you....it appears we are done

I have been very respectful and stating points in a civil manner....you do not have to agree with them but there is no need for that type of response

Pennsylvania violated their own laws, but that was okay for you because it worked in your favor....you actually listed other states that broke the law to defend Pennsylvania breaking their laws.

Pennsylvania actually waived federal requirements without approval of their senators lol

ID