Message from @JD~Jordan
Discord ID: 794793245032710144
As well she should...
and then her sister rules to leave 4000 on that moved out of the area
I'm just saying
She should have@JD~Jordan
Not the forcast. Sorry helping grandparents work their TV.... kill me
If you can't see the conflict of interest in the judge sister of a woman actively recruiting voters allowing over 4000 ineligible voters to vote anyway I'm not even sure what to say to you anymore
First off... you are assuming facts not in evidence. One side claims that those people moved.
And it is very sketchy that they are removing that many people from just a few counties just before a Runoff that decides the Senate and less than a month after a Presidential Election.
So the optics of the removal of those 4,000 is bad too.... At least as to the timing.
I personally don't see how Biden one either...@Azizah ... But I do Wonder why we only keep getting crooked bastards...m
she never said they didn't move....she said they couldn't do a systematic purge within 90 days of an election.....again using a technicality to allow over 4000 votes from people that moved.
If you think Trump is not part of machine you're believing yourself@Azizah
I agreed with you that she should have recused herself. Do I think that it was a legal requirement that she recuse herself? No, probably not. Judges have a great deal of latitude on issues like that and its not the worst nonrecusal I have ever seen... but she still should have resuced herself
so for future elections it comes down to who casts the ballots for those 4000 people first? my point exactly....encouraging cheating
how much do you want to bet those 4000 people are still on the voter logs in 2 years?
who cheated?
It’s like an Xbox live lobby in here!
If you have been reading anything I have stated....my concern is all of the doors left open for cheating
and the refusal to close them
One more time.... you are assuming those 4,000 people did actually move out of State. One side says they did and one side says maybe not.
So, allowing them to vote on provisional ballots (if they show up to vote) IS the right thing to do.
The SCOTUS has long since ruled that courts should always err on the side of allowing votes instead of suppressing them.
So... I absolutely agree that the judge ruled correctly. I just think she should have allowed another judge hear the case given the nature of it.
ther are checks and balances in place. whose refusing? the only one who has blocked electoral reform is Mitch McConnel. and i won't lie, i haven't read all that you have posted.
@mg216, you just advanced to level 5!
Also... @Azizah there is tons of case law suggesting that voter roll purges should never take place on the eve of an election (and by eve I dont mean the night before but a few months before)
some states have people that have been dead over 20 years on the voter logs but according to your previous statements each state can do what they choose......legally you are correct but should we really allow states to be negligent in updating voter logs?
and then use that negligence to possibly impact an election and they throw up their hands and say oooops
somebody please kill me.
LOL... ok wow... why are you even arguing this? FEDERAL law prohibits the cleaning of voter rolls 90 days before any federal election.
The judge didn't matter... its a fucking violation of federal law
https://www.justice.gov/crt/national-voter-registration-act-1993-nvra
The removing of those names less than 90 days before the Senate Runoff is fucking illegal
its like fucking clear as day
It also prohibits people from voting twice but that doesn't matter either....did you see that Texas is actually passing a law that makes it illegal to vote if you are dead now....because if you don't have that as a law its technically not illegal
that is how absurd things have become
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
@SoonMrWick elaborate
@Azizah this is where the legal concept of "moot" means
Its completely fucking moot that Abrams sister made the ruling because the law is fucking crystal clear. YOU CAN NOT CLEAN OR PURGE VOTER ROLLS 90 DAYS BEFORE A FEDERAL ELECTION.
We are within 90 days of the Senate Runoff.... so the attempted removal of those names violates The National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
Your concern is moot, tired and at this point ridiculous
WW2 propaganda was the greatest meme warfare in the history of the world.
wow it seems that civil conversation is no longer appropriate for you....it appears we are done