https://youtu.be/Hgc8eDl3SLQ

IIRC she was all about defunding the police and tried to force wheeler to give her control of the police

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy Thank you both for the great stream again, have a good night! 3k almost tonight, wild!

Id feel bad for Robert if he had to represent Trump

I'm having a blast but look forward to getting back to bad popo.

For sure, but it's also important stuff, and a lot of cases are waiting on updated dockets, Zulu.

Yeah I have a feeling they weren't taking a break from protecting and serving the hell out of people.

For sure lol

Also, I didn't know it @RobertGrulerEsq , but that epic cop rant to that NY SC Judge was a youtuber.

No kidding @Maw do you have his channel?

https://www.youtube.com/c/AngryCopsMadatWork/videos

I still laugh thinking about that.... "GUYYYYYYY"

Amazing stream tonight - wow! Thank you to everyone for being a part of the show. Incredible!

And thank you @FaithJoy and @Maw -derator clicking like crazy! Appreciate you all.

Haha.

Anytime.

Yeah, I was surprised when I found out that cop was a youtuber.

Lol mawderator

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy i could set up a bot to automatically announce new videos if you would like

or i could send you a video on how to do it

That's awesome @spacefan247 that'd be great. I'll ping Ms. @FaithJoy to DM you.

@RobertGrulerEsq Uncivil Law turned some of us on to your channel

No kidding? That's very nice of him I'll have to reach out! Thanks for the heads up.

Your welcome.

Didnt realize that @RobertGrulerEsq is lowkey jacked lol. If you told me he was a personal trainer who also coached the local high school women's bball team, i would believe it

Lol no no I just like to wear extra small shirts!

Small + mediums = smediums size according to my friends.

I haven't worn a medium shirt in 11 years

I enjoyed it thanks for the alternative to big media.

Robert, where do you get your information and how do you have confidence in it? How do you identify which legal challenges or whatever to take seriously?

@RobertGrulerEsq ^

@A211 tagging is more helpful for getting attention

All over the place @A211 usually starting with Twitter which leads down different rabbit holes. Legal documents I prefer to go straight to the source when the public record is available (like the official court orders or memos etc.)

@RobertGrulerEsq
Rob Ive seen this guy on twitter I think its @File411 maybe you wanna look into

@RobertGrulerEsq yesterday I think you had a letter from some election commissioner (AZ? NV?) that said something about investigating out of a an abundance of caution for integrity purposes etc., where can I find that?

https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/post/statement-from-senate-president-karen-fann-on-the-integrity-of-the-election-in-arizona

Thank you!

@RobertGrulerEsq A quick question from across the pond when and if you have time. In the American system, how does the defense acquire forensic experts? Do you have individuals and companies chosen from a "phonebook" or is there some kind of certification process? Does the prosecution have to agree on the experts hired by the defense, or are you free to hire anyone?

Hey @Doc great question. It is mostly a free market. Defense experts sort of self-credential based on their selected fields. In criminal law, there are no standards of what qualify a person as being an "expert" because it is such a broad term. So if you wanted someone who is an expert on a blood analysis saying a DUI case involving a death, you would go find someone who is highly qualified on that topic. Typically these are people with PhDs and a lot of experience or authorship in the subject. Also frequently ex-government employees (like former DUI officers or ex-crime lab employees). We don't agree with the prosecutors but they are free to cross-examine them and undermine their credibility in front a jury, as we are free to do to their experts.

(That is the layman's explanation - for more information on this stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard)