@FaithJoy Whenever they press that green button to override the ballot rejection the machine should be maintaining a log unless the vendor removed the log feature.
@RobertGrulerEsq I am one of those forensic type guys you are talking about I have a Bachelors of Applied Science in Information Technology and Administrative Management specializing in Cybersecurity with a minor digital forensics and incident response
@RobertGrulerEsq Those machine are only connected to the vendor provided switches when they need to update the software so if an update happened during the election it was deliberate
I feel like if they were smart enough to remove the logging they smart enough to know thats bold and a red flag if there's suspicion. Dont get me started on what can be done to a device through its firmware though I might slip.
Essentially you can mimic an legit official version and design it intricately enough that everything appears normal, like when magicians seem to reveal the secret only to reveal more layers layer on.
Ive heard there was a official fw push to correct an error during polling which means there's probably no more evidence of that error or log files to examine. I dont know if thats true or not.
I can only come to the conclusion that the moves being made are so bold so, "yeah so what" and all reliant on "Orange man bad, you dont want orange man do you ?"
> I feel like if they were smart enough to remove the logging they smart enough to know thats bold and a red flag if there's suspicion. Dont get me started on what can be done to a device through its firmware though I might slip. @evildood89 The problem is the vendors/companies are private entities and not subject to the same oversight as the government.
Im not necessarily concerned that outside actors were able to comprise the voting software (which I need to look into more) Im more or less suggesting that the companies operating the software do fall under that grey area WYD mentioned and I believe Ive also seen Dominon ? Being linked to the Clinton foundation
It doesn't matter what I understand. My understanding is that we can continually make claims, no matter how well informed, and it will seem like not all of them can be false.
In order to fake the emails they would need access to hunters oauth tokens which if they have the ability to manipulate google like that they can do worse than a laptop
I watched a very interesting talk last night from Hillsdale College , a man named Robert Epstein gave a good look into how big tech manipulated search engine results leading up to the election. He claimed that google alone could have influenced millions to vote for Biden.
> Rootkits are what come to mind if you're looking at programs that actively start inserting themselves into the kernel. @Maw For a rootkit to get into the machines you would need to have support in the election office or the vendor site to deploy it
