Not unless she gave you permission.

Hi, I’m your Boogieman that’s what I am.

I would have beem courtmarshalled so fast

Pre, During, and Post.... In writing.

😆

Thank God my dad had military values because even though I must have had the longest adolescences of all time, I STILL think of his expectations everyday

It helps. I gotta go to bed. C y'all again sometime, ya hear?

Night

I'm going to go take care of this testicle spur.

Really acts up right before bed.

😄

My grandmother told us that we were descended of Increase Mather (father of Cotton Mather - from the Salem Witchcraft Trials infamy - though she always made a point of saying that we were not descended from Cotton). We have an extensive genealogy and it shows that my ancestors have fought (and some died) in every conflict since before the Revolutionary War. I was brought up with it. My parents served, my uncle in Vietnam, my grandfather and his brothers in WWII, my great grandfather and his brother in WWI... you get the idea.

@Whithers It's been a pleasure...

I am adding yall as friends so we can get another great convo after the next RR podcast

Sounds good

Fkkkk

Wow 👀 freaking Or. Dan's family from Forest Gump. Your family is a real life. Mind boggling

God bless yalls linege

I wish I wasnt such a light weight these days because I am enjoying this. Now time to go check out dambusters on YouTube. I watch so much military stuff. My wife is like how can you sleep while listening. I tell her its easier than listening to fiction

Good night

Night

Night

When will the next live stream be?

Monday!

@RobertGrulerEsq Are you going to be streaming on Thanksgiving? We had some questions regarding that last night.

Hi @Maw unfortunately no, my mother would never allow it!

Will be back Friday, though.

Not a problem, thanks for the prompt response!

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx this looks interesting

Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito & Brett Kavanaugh have each been personally assigned the disputed states in the election.

Not to impugn the honor and integrity of the SCOTUS, but considering 3 of them have legal history in matters of this nature, and having been assigned to these heavily contested states only makes one wonder about the outcome of this election.

I think it's a big nothingburger.

ACB was part of the 7th district prior to becoming an associate justice.

Largely these assignments have been the same for the associate justices in the past.

I wrote a fairly large sum opinion about it earlier.

Also this was so ordered by Roberts.

This is a man who has shown he's not exactly in Trump's pocket, so-to-speak.

You also have to understand that simply being advisory and a part of the review process for appellate courts does not directly reflect the outcome of the cases themselves in my understanding.

Certainly you could argue it could influence the results of a case indirectly and I don't think many would argue against that.

But I think it's significant overreach or going well out of the comfort zones of normality to assume that because these justices so happen to be assigned to these districts (largely unchanged from my understanding from prior to RBG leaving us) to indicate this has any sort of bearing on the legitimacy of Trump's legal team's claims, or the idea that this was set up by the president himself.

My position however is that of a layman.