I think that graph is telling that the overton window needs to be shifted more to the right 😎

economically, though?

idk if were really on that graph

were on the z axis

We’re an eclectic group, for sure. I don’t have to underscore the commonality for you though.

transcend the x y graph and rise western man

We could just create a new party...eventually.

I think everyone here understands that no matter your detailed social or economic positions, it’s almost pointless to try to rectify society in those ways when the central premise is as flawed as multiculturalism.

Lets call it "The Milquetoast Opinions of Some of The Founding Fathers'" Party

That's one has already been done in practice.

Best to just let them keep their fake name.

>the future
>senate is now controlled by
>based and redpilled party
>formed in Norther California
>just after it was reconquered
>1 day after declaring itself
>a Mexican state

Dude that’s a 10/10 haiku

@Jacob Economically, too, imo. I just want a future for White people to be honest, how we peacefully get there doesn't matter to me. (except communism)

oh

I actually wouldn't mind moving left economically lol

>it is governed by
>King Freiheit
>titles of nobility were returned
>after the ascension of
>king barak obama the 2nd
>and congress never got rid of titles
>since the Dread Good King
>Baron Trump assumed rule
>of the kingdom of North America

I'm done now

No more future jokes from me for a while.

@Jacob but not le communism duh

Communism is the big ghey.

Communists be like, "Let's get this brea- oh..."

4分の3念
誰かのタイピング
全て消す

Communism is bad but the whole thing about Eastern Europe starving like Africa is an exaggeration tbh

@Jacob To an extent I get how you could say you dislike large multinational corporations in some sectors

Idk, mixed economy keeps both segments from growing too large

The hysteria around communism, to a large extent, was used to justify immigration

“No government 0 restrictions free market” = “oh so 5 companies are the government now”

It certainly is an exaggeration after 1950, the USSR citisens were very malnourished until recent years, not quite starving to *death,* but I get your point man

the reason I don't like that narrative is that it kind of defames my people's history in a way

I think we should admit our mistakes in history, but I don't think we should make it sound like we had an entire period where all we did was fail

Unrestricted capitalism is also the big ghey <:varg:359010745192808449>
@Jacob Warsaw and the Polish hussars are pretty cool my man

In a way I kind of admire the way Russians are unapologetic about the Soviet Union

I agree, too, I don't like admitting that England is heavily cucked, or that Germany created Weimar in the 1900s and then Weimerica in 1950

Russians being proud or at least unashamed of the Soviet Union >>>>>>> brits apologizing for ruling 1/4 of the earth

I think the "Stalin dindu nuffin" narrative is a bit too far, but they should take pride in the good parts of that era and not exaggerate the bad parts

Jacob takes a stance against tankies

I suppose nobody has ever held them accountable for USSR war crimes, though, nobody marched into Russia after WWII and did stuff to 2 million Russian women and babies and bombed civilian cities. I think their mindset would be different, had they been held accountable for everything.

Asides from Bolshevik Jews wanting to overthrow the Tsars, one should recognize that the Tsars were pretty stagnant and inbred like most European monarchies. They were just ass backwards until Peter the Great so got the revolution later.

the tsars were really bad

a lot of people downplay it because they think tsars = based anti-communists