It garunteed less than average quality. It shackled the whole to sub par mediocrity. It would be far preferable to permit the horrible so that you might also permit the excellent.

I still believe in democracy personally, but it can be black-pilling that the people most likely to vote are the ones most likely to be affected by governmental actions. And which group is that? Those whose incomes and lifestyles mostly or entirely rely on governmental subsidization.

Democracy, and by extension, a constitutional republic, was never meant to extend power to the lowest common denominator. And it definitely wasnt meant to be a political strategy in which usurper could just import and expand that denominator.

Collaborative decision making has its place but it's greatest act is to considate power in a competent executive. Selection of systems and policies should occur organically. Basically darwinianism should be applied to competing human systems.

I believe this multitude of competing executive powers is both the secret to free market and europes success.

Darwin anticipated entire races going extinct because they simply could not compete. He didnt not take into account that we would develop a suicidal altruism in which people took classical liberalism and egalitarianism further than thought possible.

Transnationalism is cancer for the same reason monopoly is cancer. You need both speciation and selection.

Man my grammar today...

I'm actually studying darwin in the anthropology class I had mentioned. Interesting stuff

I mean the class it's self is totally pozzed but I like the darwin part haha

Human governance should be designed as an ecology. Design for competition and evolution.

Our downfall has been either eliminating speciation (tyranny) or selection (anarchy).

Can anyone red bar me on how evolution works in the sense that a species can evolve into having more or less chromosomes than the previous generation and still be able to procreate? I think I looked it up before but I wasnt satisfied with the answer.

Look up hybrid fertility. There's mechanisms to detect genetic distance

You can actually see early signs of hybrid infertility in inter racial couples.

Interesting

Hopped on YouTube to catch the tail end of the SotU, because I fell asleep last night, and got these search results:

Check out "Developing News"...

There's pre fertilization compatibility detection where if certain genes don't get expressed in the new dna then the embryo is terminated.

I should say zygote

But can we observe or is there any proof that evolution is occurring. I dont doubt evolution or adaptation exists, I'm just wondering how it can happen. Like if us and chimps have a common ancestor, Why do we have different amounts of chromosomes?

This results in probablistically lower fertility as genetic distance increases. You can observe this in extreme cases of human interacial couples.

Evolution has been observed in bacteria with fast enough reproductive cycle

Did the bacteria turn into non bacteria?

We have different numbers of chromosome, because two ancient ape chromosomes fused to result in human chromosome 2.

Why did SCOTUS not have any reactions to the SOTU? Are they not allowed to?

No but their genetic material increases.

@Chris N. - CA where did those two apes get their chromosomes from? Was there just that much diversity eons ago?

Humans can survive doubling certain chromosomes. For example two Y chromosomes confer some benfits.

Theoretically you couple double the Y chromosome and then have one of them evolve new traits.

This is so out of my realm of knowledge. Fascinating.

Triple X or double Y chromosome people are fascinating study in gender traits. Many double Y end up in prison.

They're hyper aggressive

In another world they might be super men though.

You would think with the massive amount of people we have on the globe, more mutations would be occuring.

I’m at the gym and on one of the TVs it says: Breaking news: Warren listed race as American Indian for Texas bar. 😂

Well they are. Look up occipedal lobe.

I guess we're so artificially dysgenic now, it would be hard to tell if it was beneficial or not.

Autism appears to be linked to a recent genetic trait

@Bogl - CA There has been diversity throughout the span of life on Earth. 99.9% of all species that have ever existed are extinct. To my knowledge, genomes used to be in single circular forms, but they eventually developed into the multiple linear chromosomes we see today. So technically, chimps got their chromosomes from all the way back to their eukaryotic ancestors.

Also, mutations do occur. Look at eye color, for example. Blue eyes are a mutation.