Ok?

If they weren't in these fields the sun and the moon would be too high and would disprove the globe just based on the height they would be away

That and the fact that the sun would be lighting up most, if not all, of the earth

Plus doesn't this type of flat earth model simply dismiss the dome also due to the sun and moon not being in the field?

Unless the sun and the moon are beaming down against the dome which is a pretty "meh" you have to admit

The Sun wouldn't light up all of flat earth. Light would have to travel infinitely far or nearly so, in order to do so.

True but it wouldn't light it up either

That's also why I said i thought it would have to be within the torus field.

It would make a bit more sense if it were inside then outside of it

Philosophically and scientifically, I have to accept all possibilities.

You should accept the possibilities that will line up with your proof

Light does nearly travel infinite distance tho...

Mad Philosopher knows how light works already Agent

Alright

Prove it

I like how you say "prove it" but then I will say "we can see light from other galaxies and stars" and you'll just say "oh those don't exist".

So basically this argument doesn't work

I understand that's how it would need to work on the heliocentric model, but that's not what we observe.

I never made the claim they don't exist

Yeah but since you're a flat earther, I assume you don't believe in space.

Basically every argument anyone who doesn't agree with you makes gets replied to with "oh well that doesn't exist".

<:flatearth:564527756180979724>

You’re arguing something he didn’t even say.

Shit, you’re an idiot.

You should never assume Agent

I came here and made the same mistake but you'll be surprised

(says the flat earther) But he said to prove that light travels VERY long distance and I can't even argue because I'll just be told that the thing doesn't exist. If you could read, you'd see that.

The light argument will last hours if you talk about it

Trust me I've had it with mad Philosopher many different times

Yes because it's always the 2nd grade argument of "nuh-uh".

You’ll just be told they don’t exist? You’re the only one saying that.

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Deleted User has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

damn

Maybe if you'd read what I was typing, you would understand what I'm saying @Derek Nelson .

I'd just say that it is better to take what you are told from the person before just putting them in one category

Yeah but they seem to put logical people in a category so...

I do understand. You’re arguing a hypothetical point, none of us are saying, because you can’t actually prove the distance of stars. So you insert the notion, “well, you’ll just say they don’t exist”, to throw the argument under the bus.

You're thinking too linearly and three dimensionally.