Message from @Fran
Discord ID: 596807061380005921
but, just saying, you don't need gravity to have the fact that things fall
hm? that sounds like 2nd law of thermodynamics, instead of buoyancy
well they are related
ok now i think i see what you're saying. the pressure gradient of earth's atmosphere, i think that'd be a result of buoyancy bork
i guess things fall, then that causes buoyancy and the atmosphere's pressure gradient, and all wheter or not there's a globe and gravity
most people say buoyancy completely ignoring the pretty much indisputable fact that buoyancy acts under the assumption of a force
@raspberry What does buoyancy have to do with increasing entropy?
^
^^
What cat said
one person told me we could also be spinning in a circle and gravity is actually a mix of gravity and acceleration from centripetal force
Hey Demon! @demonwarrior2266
the acceleration change would near match that of gravity
like up at mt everest
you guys steadily coming over to the dark side, huh? yup, there's actual debates to be had here.
yeah but im saying the one person said the whole earth is flat and spinning about a point really fast
they probably just claim it doesn't exist.
as radius (height increases) decreases force actually decreases
they do undeniably
like usually people will say something contradictory to them
And I will just go ????
*"have you been there?"*
relativity is that one topic noone either sides dares to try to explain
Well
cue 97 Eleven
globe model has it down pretty well lol
It's just your average person here hasn't seen relativity outside of an undergraduate physics setting
So they have a poopoo understanding of it
It is true that GR is unfinished. It works great on regular scales but fails on quantum and macro scales.
yeah I would give flat earth models a chance if they actually explained themselves well but when people don't even admit to a downward force which would be required for buoyancy to work I can't do it
I'm surprised the denisty/buoyancy argument still exists, honestly. It's so easily falsified by simply dropping objects in a vacuum chamber.
thats true every buoyancy arguement is debunked. clever thinking
I didn't think about that
It's usually glazed over when I suggest it. 😑
This dude in the other flat Earth discord tried to tell me the scientific method had to begin at observing "natural phenomenon" so man made experiments don't count 😴
Wtf
all man made experiments, huh? best Get Out Of Jail Free card ever.
Thats not how science works
i asked him to justify the distinction and he just said "it says natural phenomenon" and just did like a mix of appeal to authority and appeal to nature