Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Discord ID: 588106636451905536


2019-06-11 20:44:04 UTC  

thats what people are fighting for ...

2019-06-11 20:44:05 UTC  

Deforestation is a big problem

2019-06-11 20:44:05 UTC  

yes, they'd rather turn forest lands into industrial farms

2019-06-11 20:44:08 UTC  

you’re all coordinating with each other, i know it when i see it, i’m here to convince the others not to waste their time with you 3

2019-06-11 20:44:11 UTC  

But CO2 is a thread

2019-06-11 20:44:18 UTC  

so much for 'caring' for the environment

2019-06-11 20:44:21 UTC  

The oceans are containing most Co2

2019-06-11 20:44:24 UTC  

morning you have and explanation or not?

2019-06-11 20:44:44 UTC  

And plants have a specific ampount of co2 they can consume

2019-06-11 20:44:55 UTC  

Its about 2.3%

2019-06-11 20:44:59 UTC  

That's not true

2019-06-11 20:45:03 UTC  

Yes

2019-06-11 20:45:05 UTC  

It is

2019-06-11 20:45:07 UTC  

2019-06-11 20:45:15 UTC  

A higher concentration wouldn't be consumed

2019-06-11 20:45:16 UTC  

just message me

2019-06-11 20:45:35 UTC  

there are limiting factors of photosynthesis and very easy to do with experiments

2019-06-11 20:45:38 UTC  

to show this

2019-06-11 20:45:43 UTC  

Yes

2019-06-11 20:45:46 UTC  

Very true

2019-06-11 20:45:48 UTC  

Are you ignorant of the guy who fed his cherry tomato plant condensed co2 and had it grow to a warehouse sized tree?

2019-06-11 20:45:52 UTC  

Apparently you are.

2019-06-11 20:46:01 UTC  

Because if so that is a great idea

2019-06-11 20:46:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/588106707620724786/image0.png

2019-06-11 20:46:15 UTC  

In fact I might just make an entire server about it

2019-06-11 20:46:19 UTC  

It didn't absorb only a portion of the co2

2019-06-11 20:46:22 UTC  

Okay so you clearly have no idea of biology @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

2019-06-11 20:46:26 UTC  

It fucking thrived

2019-06-11 20:46:30 UTC  

First of all

2019-06-11 20:46:33 UTC  

@carlito climate change is not 33.

2019-06-11 20:46:36 UTC  

I do, actually.

2019-06-11 20:46:42 UTC  

How did he "fed" them condensed co2

2019-06-11 20:46:46 UTC  

Plus

2019-06-11 20:46:47 UTC  
2019-06-11 20:46:55 UTC  

C is 3 ,, CC is 33

2019-06-11 20:46:55 UTC  

there are so many ways that NASA could easily prove us wrong. instead they dig their heads into theoretical concepts. allow flights through Antartica, literally move your cameras on your rockets, literally show us footage that isnt at that perfect fisheye lense angle. literally dont cut the footage every single time. they will never do these things

2019-06-11 20:47:03 UTC  

that is true

2019-06-11 20:47:04 UTC  

Physics I may be illiterate in but biology is my middle name

2019-06-11 20:47:05 UTC  

There is a limiting factor to the consumption of CO2 in plants

2019-06-11 20:47:10 UTC  

And

2019-06-11 20:47:22 UTC  

Why this tomato plant grew that big