Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

Discord ID: 588106429412671526


2019-06-11 20:42:09 UTC  

and just to clarify, I wasn't proving that the temperatures are as stated by NASA in the thermosphere. Just that, according to NASA's description of the thermosphere, heat transference is minimal up there due to low density gases.

2019-06-11 20:42:35 UTC  

@Morning Dew why are you so aggressive?

2019-06-11 20:42:52 UTC  

@Hamburger Guy because cognitive dissonance

2019-06-11 20:43:08 UTC  

i am the opposite of aggressive. you want me playing your game, and I wont. it’s that simple. i see through you

2019-06-11 20:43:08 UTC  

will do and thanks 😉 @Chesty

2019-06-11 20:43:12 UTC  

np

2019-06-11 20:43:22 UTC  

Oh, no!! CO2 is the end of all earth!!
Plants feed off of co2 and we keep cutting down all the plants, BUT WE CANNOT FIX IT!!
😆 Are you serious with this climate change bullshit? Stop deforestation and plant more plants. Boom. Co2 being ingested by plants more and fixing the earth.
But people won't do that because the ones in charge of this deforestation are greedy fucks who don't care about what they hurt or kill.

2019-06-11 20:43:25 UTC  

We’re triggering his fight or flight response

2019-06-11 20:43:32 UTC  

@Morning Dew I'm not very aggressive, am I? I'll calm down I guess.

2019-06-11 20:43:57 UTC  

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 vWell I m with you on the one thing

2019-06-11 20:44:04 UTC  

thats what people are fighting for ...

2019-06-11 20:44:05 UTC  

Deforestation is a big problem

2019-06-11 20:44:05 UTC  

yes, they'd rather turn forest lands into industrial farms

2019-06-11 20:44:08 UTC  

you’re all coordinating with each other, i know it when i see it, i’m here to convince the others not to waste their time with you 3

2019-06-11 20:44:11 UTC  

But CO2 is a thread

2019-06-11 20:44:18 UTC  

so much for 'caring' for the environment

2019-06-11 20:44:21 UTC  

The oceans are containing most Co2

2019-06-11 20:44:24 UTC  

morning you have and explanation or not?

2019-06-11 20:44:44 UTC  

And plants have a specific ampount of co2 they can consume

2019-06-11 20:44:55 UTC  

Its about 2.3%

2019-06-11 20:44:59 UTC  

That's not true

2019-06-11 20:45:03 UTC  

Yes

2019-06-11 20:45:05 UTC  

It is

2019-06-11 20:45:07 UTC  

2019-06-11 20:45:15 UTC  

A higher concentration wouldn't be consumed

2019-06-11 20:45:16 UTC  

just message me

2019-06-11 20:45:35 UTC  

there are limiting factors of photosynthesis and very easy to do with experiments

2019-06-11 20:45:38 UTC  

to show this

2019-06-11 20:45:43 UTC  

Yes

2019-06-11 20:45:46 UTC  

Very true

2019-06-11 20:45:48 UTC  

Are you ignorant of the guy who fed his cherry tomato plant condensed co2 and had it grow to a warehouse sized tree?

2019-06-11 20:45:52 UTC  

Apparently you are.

2019-06-11 20:46:01 UTC  

Because if so that is a great idea

2019-06-11 20:46:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/588106707620724786/image0.png

2019-06-11 20:46:15 UTC  

In fact I might just make an entire server about it

2019-06-11 20:46:19 UTC  

It didn't absorb only a portion of the co2

2019-06-11 20:46:22 UTC  

Okay so you clearly have no idea of biology @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

2019-06-11 20:46:26 UTC  

It fucking thrived

2019-06-11 20:46:30 UTC  

First of all

2019-06-11 20:46:33 UTC  

@carlito climate change is not 33.

2019-06-11 20:46:36 UTC  

I do, actually.